I started a different thread on what I think the plan is. I think some of the ammo we will get from these last 30 games could be beneficial to Lauri long term. I'm cool with the patience we are showing now. There were no moves that had me super excited. I would say by trade deadline next year the "plan" needs to be more firm and we need to have added around him. He will be good for a long time and his trade value will be good for a long time. He may end up being too far ahead of our timeline without the ability to add to him... for now I'm satisfied with what we did.As Andy Larsen pointed out, Lauri has been the 13th best player in the NBA this season. It's completely unheard of for a rebuilding team to stumble on a 25/26 year old guy this good/valuable and not try to either turn him into assets even more suitable for its overall timeline OR, much more likely, start building around him ASAP.
We may still see the former option come to pass after Lauri signs his renegotiated extension, but the latter is definitely not happening.
It just feels like the fanbase sees Lauri as part of the scenery and doesn't fully realize that the likelihood of the Jazz drafting/acquiring a player as good as him within the next decade is almost zero.
People keep saying this but IMO it's unwise to assume that Lauri stays healthy/productive far on the wrong side of 30.He will be good for a long time and his trade value will be good for a long time.
yeah maybe so. Thats not a huge concern for us right now. In the middle term he will be very good. If we can't put talent around him you trade him before he gets there. If you trade him now and then Key, Taylor become good... or you strike lotto gold... or you uncover a good trade. You may wish you had waited. I think the runway is like 8-18 months where you need to start really considering moving Lauri.People keep saying this but IMO it's unwise to assume that Lauri stays healthy/productive far on the wrong side of 30.
He's a legit 7 footer who was a one-and-done and has probably logged more miles in the NBA than any big over the seven years he's been in the league. Lauri's style of play is extremely taxing on the body and he averages 30mpg over his career. It's not crazy to suggest that his longevity may suffer as a result.
Even if he changes his game a bit when he hits 30, we can safely assume that his best years physically are going to take place during his forthcoming extension deal. What happens after that is anyone's guess.
yeah maybe so. Thats not a huge concern for us right now. In the middle term he will be very good. If we can't put talent around him you trade him before he gets there. If you trade him now and then Key, Taylor become good... or you strike lotto gold... or you uncover a good trade. You may wish you had waited. I think the runway is like 8-18 months where you need to start really considering moving Lauri.
We were heading to a first round exit, if we made the playoffs at all. Not a historic upset.
I don't even like the trades, but we can still retool around Lauri in the off-season.
Two wins over bucks, demolishing Nuggets, tough road tour.... Aaa d back at beating... Hol up, checking it... Yep,Bucks and thunder.We were heading to a first round exit, if we made the playoffs at all. Not a historic upset.
I don't even like the trades, but we can still retool around Lauri in the off-season.
So you don't think teams like keeping all stars on their roster then.Not if they're so valuable that they could be used to acquire a bunch of expensive assets that fit the contending timeline of the team much better. The coming 3-4 years will be pretty rough and it really makes no sense to waste the entirety of Lauri's prime over a stretch like that.
Lauri will renegotiate and extend but it remains to be seen if he's gonna be around much longer after that.
Because those golden curls are absolutely adorable.
Top 20 guys usually play on teams that are trying to contend. Either now or in the very near future. So no **** they're not getting traded.So you don't think teams like keeping all stars on their roster then.
That explains all the all stars who got moved today. Including Lauri
I'm gonna miss him but it will be fun watching what he does on his new team once I figure out just where the hell he got traded to
You still haven't responded to my post.Top 20 guys usually play on teams that are trying to contend. Either now or in the very near future. So no **** they're not getting traded.
Lauri is unique in that he's a youngish top 20 guy on a team that just got worse on purpose. That just doesn't happen.
As I said, the only two really logical/conventional options for the Jazz are/were:
1) Flip Lauri for future assets
2) Build around him right now with the pile of assets they have