Best case scenario he's filler in a S&T this summer.
S&T? He's already signed
Best case scenario he's filler in a S&T this summer.
Trey was the least efficient of the three (and yet jacked up the most shots....)
We know the Jazz were trying to use him to get a first rounder, based on what DL said. So, now what? Where does Trey end up? Detroit seems to have been mentioned a lot. Atlanta? Philadelphia? Wherever, it seems like we are going to get peanuts, literally, for him. Can't even get a late first rounder in an uncertain and what appears to be a weak draft. He may end up overseas.
Burke is an NBA player... we should have kept him in the rotation. Could have been a mildly intriguing asset. Now will be a salary dump. We will not buy him out.
Doesn't change that he is an inefficient chucker that's too small and slow and doesn't get teammates involved enough though.Misleading comparison. Easier to have higher efficiency at Neto's 17% usage (shooting a 3 when wide open) versus Burke's 25% being asked to provide scoring off the bench.
I agree with TB's benching, but more for his defensive liability.
And while what you say is true, it's doesn't guarantee that neto and mack efficiency would go down with higher usage (macks usage went up A LOT when coming to the jazz from atlanta and his efficiency actually went up A LOT too?). It's a good hypothesis but far from fact.Misleading comparison. Easier to have higher efficiency at Neto's 17% usage (shooting a 3 when wide open) versus Burke's 25% being asked to provide scoring off the bench.
I agree with TB's benching, but more for his defensive liability.
Doesn't change that he is an inefficient chucker that's too small and slow and doesn't get teammates involved enough though.
All that still remains true
And while what you say is true, it's doesn't guarantee that neto and mack efficiency would go down with higher usage (macks usage went up A LOT when coming to the jazz from atlanta and his efficiency actually went up A LOT too?). It's a good hypothesis but far from fact.
We can only compare the actual stats we have and cannot extrapolate fantasy numbers based off usage hypothesis.
Yes it's likely I think. Some players rise to the occasion though when given more responsibility. (Look at macks numbers last year with very very low usage in atl vs starting and playing a very big role with the jazz. It's shocking how much better he was when given a bigger offensive role)If you ask Neto to score more, this means he takes a higher percentage of difficult and contested shots. We agree it is a good hypothesis but it is an experiment that will never be run, so will remain a mystery forever.
I disagree. For his entire (albeit short) nba career he has been a small, unathletic chucker pg who doesn't get his teammates involved and plays poor defense.
And we gave up multiple lotto picks to get him. And handed him a starting job and tons of minutes and a coach who loved him. He had a bitchy parent that always talked ****. He posted inappropriate pictures online.
Some of that isn't his fault. All of it are reasons to not like him.
Only thing he did good was not cry when his starting job went away and his minutes ace role decreased. That's it.
He had some stretches of good play. Pretty much every player in the nba does if given minutes.
He sucks. Always has. His value to other teams sucks. Always has.
None of that would have changed imo no matter how many minutes quin would have undeservingly handed to him.
This might be another one of those agree to disagrees..... Though often when this happens between you and I, I don't feel very confident that I'm right and can totally understand where you are coming from. This isn't one of those times.
Still love your takes most all the time though.