Which Jazz player would benefit the most from +3 inches height and +4 inches wingspan?

[The Blue Elephant]

If I made a thread "who could most afford giving up 3" height and 4" wingspan" my pick would be Gordon Hayward. I think he would still make a pretty good point guard.

 

[b_line]

Gordon is a good player. I imagine him being a small forward still, maybe a stretch four if he were taller. Being able to see over taller defenders and make the pass to the block easier would be a benefit, and his defense would surely benefit from it. Kind of a mix of dirk and Durant with defense. Like PKM said, best player in the league.

 

[The Blue Elephant]

Ok, who is the dude that keeps rating my threads 1 star

 

[b_line]

I thought GH was 6'9. He's only 6'8?

He looks a little bit shorter than lebron, who is supposed to be 6'9". I think hayward was listed as 6'8".

 

[Karadrys30]

I went booker. Then he would have the body he needs for the way he plays. Evens was tempting.

 

[Dr. Jones]

^odds

 

[MTS]

I voted for Hayward without a second thought.

 

[Ron Mexico]

Favors, he would be a beast on both end of the court, more than he is.

Hayward would be okay but I doubt he could dribble around and drive like he does now with the added height.

Evans would be an NBA rotational player or maybe a starter. Booker would be a starter in this league with the added height and wingspan.

Burks would be awesome to have that height and wingspan. I think he would be a great SF with some ferocious dunks.

 

[QuinSnydersHair]

There is only one acceptable answer; Hayward.

I was thinking Hayward or Kanter. If Kanter had that much more size, his lack of athleticism would be far less a big deal. He'd be about 7'1 and strong as ****. Sort of Shaq-ish minus the explosiveness.

 

[fishonjazz]

I'd have to say Ian Clark or gordon hayward. Either of them would have elite size at their position with that added size. Hayward would basically be Durant with better defense and passing, less scoring. Clark would be a good 3 and d guy. Probably almost all star shooting guard.

Hayward is a good pick.

I probably choose kanter though

 

[fishonjazz]

I was thinking Hayward or Kanter. If Kanter had that much more size, his lack of athleticism would be far less a big deal. He'd be about 7'1 and strong as ****. Sort of Shaq-ish minus the explosiveness.

Damn dude, read my mind again

 

[mellow]

I was going o say Trey, but then realized the jazz already have a tall pg with long arms and he can shoot better. Also, realized the jazz could have had a long pg with poor shooting in the2013 draft, but the picked Trey instead of MCW.

A 7-1 Enes would be best. No vertical? No problem. It might also help him in that chili cook off thing.