Ineptimusprime
Well-Known Member
Having watched Chet multiple times, I don’t get it with him AT ALL. Total bust waiting to happen.
He is basically Bol Bol with Work Ethic and is a gym rat. I see why. He blocks shots and can shootHaving watched Chet multiple times, I don’t get it with him AT ALL. Total bust waiting to happen.
That is a more interesting question than I first thought: The answer is ~50% (counting from 2000).anyone know the odds of the #1 pick becoming a multi-year all star? I imaging it’s likely higher than the rest of the picks but how does it actually play out?
* Calculating this should be inverted: counting how many 1st tier players were drafted top-3 rather than how many of said picks become 1st tier as that is - as any bin would be - a very low number (though, you could do a comparative analysis in this way comparing top-3 picks to lottery, non-lottery 1st, or later).That is a more interesting question than I first thought: The answer is ~50% (counting from 2000).
I think the better question is what are the odds that a 1st tier NBA player/legit superstar/perennial MVP candidate/top-10 player is drafted in the top-3*? Cuz Mitchell isn't that and won't be that either. A bit of a one-in-hand vs two-in-the-bush kind of scenario, but the Jazz would not be weighing this if there weren't valid concerns about the longterm prospects of keeping him (his best teammates are set to age-out soon, multi-year rumors leaking that he's got a foot out the door, friction between his best teammate).
All-in-all, I think this is the valid returning value on a Mitchell trade.
Anything possible but I would be shocked if Keegan is the best player from the class.so close between jabari, paolo and chet. gun to my head, i probably take jabari. but there is a part of me that thinks keegan should be in that conversation. there will be multiple teams that regret not taking that dude.
Really great research and thought process. I like it.* Calculating this should be inverted: counting how many 1st tier players were drafted top-3 rather than how many of said picks become 1st tier as that is - as any bin would be - a very low number (though, you could do a comparative analysis in this way comparing top-3 picks to lottery, non-lottery 1st, or later).
From the vantage point of how many elite players were drafted top-3 in the last 20 years, let's say that this is the list you're working with
-Lebron James
-Giannis
-Steph Curry
-Kevin Durant
-James Harden (doesn't really belong on the list right this second, but recently enough and for long enough that I would consider him belonging)
-Joel Embiid
-Nikola Jokic
-Kawhi Leonard
-Anthony Davis
-... Luka? (right?)
Well from that group, we have:
Top-3: 6
Lottery: 2
Non-lottery 1st: 1
2nd round and later: 1
You'll get a similar outcome if you swap a player from the list here or there with Jayson Tatum, Chris Paul, or Paul George (I think it falls off after this point).
If you're counting top-3 versus the field, that's probably greater than or equal to 50% of elite talent is drafted in the top 3.
Yeah was definitely more interested on if it’s a risky return of value or not. Thanks for the insightThat is a more interesting question than I first thought: The answer is ~50% (counting from 2000).
I think the better question is what are the odds that a 1st tier NBA player/legit superstar/perennial MVP candidate/top-10 player is drafted in the top-3*? Cuz Mitchell isn't that and won't be that either. A bit of a one-in-hand vs two-in-the-bush kind of scenario, but the Jazz would not be weighing this if there weren't valid concerns about the longterm prospects of keeping him (his best teammates are set to age-out soon, multi-year rumors leaking that he's got a foot out the door, friction between his best teammate).
All-in-all, I think this is the valid returning value on a Mitchell trade.