I think Hayward will take a decent step up. Kanter will be our main post offense. Burke will get his.
Maybe 18ppg for Hayward
16 for Kanter
14 for Burke
I dont' know why, but, I'm expecting a much larger role for Hayward this year. Maybe I'm wrong. But, I'm seeing him being the focal point of the offense this year with expanded minutes to boot.
Have to wait and see.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];608621 said:Hayward ISO = no. He's always needed a pick to be really effective.
I think you'll see a PnR-driven offense since Burke and Hayward both are good here. Burks showed flashes of goodness here, too.
We only have one iso player ... Burks. I hope he gets let off the leash a bit.
I think everybody is going to score, I'm just concerned about who is going to step up when plays break down. Burks could be a good option here, I just don't have any idea how Corbin expects to use him. Maybe Kanter in the post will emerge as our best option in these situations.
The only post play I want to see is with Kanter, don't really think Favors will be good enough to justify going to him. Favors should be used exclusively as a pick and roll player with Burke. Obviously you put Burks in the corner for his three and baseline driving ability. Hayward at the top of the arc for three or can break down the D on a kickout.
Kanter 18 ppg
Burks 15 ppg
Hayward 15 ppg
Favors 14 ppg
Burke 13 ppg
Bench - 18
Put him in just to be the enforcer.. he'd only need to play like 1 minute per game.