Electrical aversion therapy. The difference is simple but important.I prefer electro-shock therapy. Every wrong call they get a jolt in the nuts, and/or privates.
Electrical aversion therapy. The difference is simple but important.I prefer electro-shock therapy. Every wrong call they get a jolt in the nuts, and/or privates.
As long as it represent a shock to the balls, it works for me.Electrical aversion therapy. The difference is simple but important.
Eh, they would most likely have to wait for a dead ball scenario, couldn't just barge onto the floor screaming for a review, something like that. And there would have to be a time limit for it, like the next dead ball or within 1 minute of game time or something, idk. I still think it could be done but it would have to really require some forethought how to make it possible without disrupting the flow of the game, and they would have to identify what the outcome would, would it be loss of points, additional free throws, possession, all of the above? I think to stop frivolous use of it there would have to be a stiff penalty if they are wrong, like additional free throws for the opposing team, or maybe even double technical on the coach and he is ejected with the resulting tech free throws, something like that probably.Because it would be used incorrectly in an unsportsmanlike manner.
What if during a crucial part of the end of a game the opponent is going down for an uncontested layup and I decide to suddenly challenge a call that i "think was missed". Easy way to stop the easy dunk/layup. Thats just one example how challenging missed no calls could be abused but Im certain there are probably some other ways.
Eh, they would most likely have to wait for a dead ball scenario, couldn't just barge onto the floor screaming for a review, something like that. And there would have to be a time limit for it, like the next dead ball or within 1 minute of game time or something, idk. I still think it could be done but it would have to really require some forethought how to make it possible without disrupting the flow of the game, and they would have to identify what the outcome would, would it be loss of points, additional free throws, possession, all of the above? I think to stop frivolous use of it there would have to be a stiff penalty if they are wrong, like additional free throws for the opposing team, or maybe even double technical on the coach and he is ejected with the resulting tech free throws, something like that probably.
True, but there really needs to be some recourse for this kind of thing, especially given how dangerous this play was. Ingles play was nowhere near as aggressive nor dangerous, but he gets kicked out. They should at least be able to file a public complaint with the league with some kind of action taken against the ref team that night, or something. I know they say they can but we all know nothing comes of that ever. Cuban proved that.Ya it sounds too messy. I dont think its a good idea and im someone who loves the fact that there are reviews and wish there were more.
Start challenging no calls and refs start calling all the ticky tack stuff they let slide now. More whistles is probably a bad thing imo
Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app