Red
Well-Known Member
Are you making milk great again?
Not without Oreo cookies....
Are you making milk great again?
I don't know. I'd say when someone gets a victory let them have their victory lap.Folks, we can argue another day over what the proper percentage of taxation should be. Right now one party is still trying to “democracy” while the other has completely given up and is now acting as a cult, covering for a wannabe dictator. There’s a reason why those in my profession (history/political science) and intelligence have been sounding the alarm for several years now.
Are we listening?
Trump’s disinformation campaign, the GOP, and our gullible media is shredding our democracy right now. I don’t know if we’ll really find out more about the Mueller probe than what we know today from Barr. Seeing the media today repeat trumpworld’s “exoneration” claim is so disheartening. Seeing Trumpworld play the country (again) really makes me wonder if he’ll he beaten in 2020. The way CNN, MSNBC, and The NY Times just roll over before him without asking any thought provoking questions is just sad for democracy.
GG=Go Girl?I don't know. I'd say when someone gets a victory let them have their victory lap.
To my dismay, Trump won the Muller probe.
GG Trump, GG.
I don't know. I'd say when someone gets a victory let them have their victory lap.
To my dismay, Trump won the Muller probe.
GG Trump, GG.
So.....
What do we argue about now?
@Bulletproof called it. He is the captain.Lmfao, you think this is over? Hahahahaja
@Bulletproof called it. He is the captain.
You can't obstruct justice if there is no actual crime.
My wife would have an answer (she's a HUGE Martha Stewart fan). Martha Stewart is a woman. Different set of rules. Again, this is what my wife said when Martha Stewart went to prison. Different set of rules.This is largelyl incorrect. See
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...-stewart-donald-trump-can-there-be-obstructi/
"Put another way, can you obstruct justice if there was theoretically nothing to obstruct? We decided to take a closer look. We checked with 11 legal experts to nail down answers. Essentially all of these experts agreed that obstruction can indeed be prosecuted without an underlying crime — and has been in the past, notably in the case of Martha Stewart."
But the authors also noted that "Several experts added, however, that there are some important distinctions between these historical precedents and what Mueller found. So the debate (sorry) will likely continue."
My wife would have an answer (she's a HUGE Martha Stewart fan). Martha Stewart is a woman. Different set of rules. Again, this is what my wife said when Martha Stewart went to prison. Different set of rules.
I remembered a case I’d been involved in against an African American minister in Richmond when I was a federal prosecutor there, who had lied to us during an investigation. And I begged this minister, “Please don’t lie to us because if you do, we’re going to have to prosecute you.” He lied. And at the end of the day, we had to prosecute him. And he went to jail for over a year. And as I stood in my office in Manhattan, I’m looking out at the Brooklyn Bridge, I remember this moment. And I’m thinking, “You know, nobody in New York knows that guy’s name except me.”Why would I treat Martha Stewart differently than that guy?” And the reason would only be because she’s rich and famous and because I’ll be criticized for it.
I don’t know if we’ll really find out more about the Mueller probe than what we know today from Barr.
What do we argue about now?
Lmfao, you think this is over? Hahahahaja
To my dismay, Trump won the Muller probe.
Thats no velociraptorThrill, why do you call the GOP a personality cult of the stupid? Why do you claim that the GOPA cares more about protecting Trump and triggering liberals than governing? You’re so partisan when you advocate for voting out the GOP at every level and empowering the democrats. Don’t you think that BOTH sides are equally to blame for the mess in Washington DC?
News today:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ness-before-states-first-muslim-woman-swears/
And
https://www.si.com/olympics/2019/03...cation-cuts-special-olympics-funding-proposal
And
So in response to a Muslim democrat being sworn into office, a republican “Christian” gives an absurd islamaphobic prayer. The sec of Edu proposes taxpayer funded handouts to private schools and cuts to special Olympics. And in response to the green new deal, Mike Lee shows pictures of Reagan riding a velociraptor, rather than propose serious legislation to lessen the effects of a very real issue, climate change. In fact, Lee explained that his solution is for people to have more kids...
But Thrill, why do you say the things you do? Aren’t both sides the same thing?