Oh, so you're on the impeachment committee?
Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?
- Thread starter Gameface
- Start date
Oh, so you're on the impeachment committee?
TheStormofWar
Well-Known Member
When you begin to alter data, that data itself is suspect to be admissible or useable. If you want to believe it, that's your call. I'm just saying you have to take it with a grain of salt.
Hotdog
Well-Known Member
Verbs are for nerds
Zombie
Well-Known Member
I think his rather obvious point is one doesn't need a special level of access to Trump's secrets to come to that conclusion. His public words and actions are enough.
The "intelligence community" isn't a single, unified entity. And yes, counter-intelligence agents lie constantly. That's their profession.
So why didn't the DNC turn over to the FBI the server that was allegedly hacked by the Russians, from which the emails in question were gathered? The instances you're pointing to are from 2015, as listed by CNN's highly credible "fast facts." Whereas, the supposed "hack" in question took place in July 2016.
I'm not connected with Q-anon, if that's what you're referring to. You could be one of the Democratic Party's shills, though, who volunteer to monitor social media and message boards on behalf the the party. I know one of those guys.
TheStormofWar
Well-Known Member
Because you can only turn over data that is in the cloud, not the physical servers themselves. The DNC did provide that data.
It's meta data. The analysis shows that the files were accessed locally and downloaded at over 23 MBPS, something that can't be achieved by a remote hack from Russia or anywhere outside a high-speed LAN.
TheStormofWar
Well-Known Member
Don't work much with WANs, do you.
That's one that made me laugh to about that link, actually. Depending on connections, that was very achievable. Hell, my home connection does well in excess of 15 Mbps. Beyond that, even with metadata, you need to preserve as much as possible. Them rocking it as a first step was pretty much made the rest of it suspect to me.
Of course. Comey was Director of the FBI under the Obama administration and up until Trump dismissed him in May 2017. When you say "the White House," you're referring to the Obama White House, rather than Trump's. It would be inaccurate to say that the Democratic Party and certain people within the FBI weren't hostile towards Trump.
And certainly, someone is not telling the truth. That's why it's important to look at forensic evidence and testimony from multiple witnesses, something that Mueller appears not to have done. How can he not know who Fusion GPS is?
Ask Bernie Sanders' supporters if it didn't hurt their candidate, and ask them why they went to court seeking restitution.
The claim that the DNC was hacked by Russians, who seized emails that showed the DNC favored Hillary, was a claim that originated with the DNC. That initial premise should be proven first, before accusing Trump for being a party to it. And yet, it wasn't directly addressed by either party during this week's hearings.
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
You don’t have to be on the impeachment committee to realize that every weekend that trump, his cabinet, and the secret service spends down at Mar-a-lago benefits him financially.
You don’t have to be on the impeachment committee to realize that inviting visiting ambassadors and leaders to stay at Trump resorts fills his wallet.
You don’t have to be on the impeachment committee to realize that abuse is taking place when you read about T-Mobile wanting to merge with sprint and then it’s leadership spending 12+ days at Trump Hotel in DC.
Duh
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
List one intelligence agency or law enforcement arm in the US government that has disagreed that Russia hacked the DNC server. I’ll wait.
Zombie
Well-Known Member
Oh, but you see they lie. That's their job, donchaknow.