People will forget about this after it happens. She will have to live with a few months of ridicule, then she will be swimming in free mula.
Because CVS is just going to shovel money her way?
People will forget about this after it happens. She will have to live with a few months of ridicule, then she will be swimming in free mula.
Now you are starting to get it.
Because CVS is just going to shovel money her way?
Is this the pot calling the kettle black?
Now, assuming that is true, all you have to do is connect that to some reason that Cyrone Torbin's comment on putting "White Bread Cracker" on a receipt was in any comparable, if you want to pretend you were making a relevant argument.
Of course, if you're just interested in pointless ad hominems, your work is done. If you were just trying to distract from Cyrone Torbin's callousness by trying to make me focus on me, you failed. Frankly, I don't really care either way what you think of me on that score. I don't need a massive amount of information or depth to recognize marginalization. You don't even pretend the comment was anything else.
Because CVS is just going to shovel money her way?
But not from Cyrone?
I love how you say you're not marginalizing it, and follow that with an entire paragraph where you marginalize and dismiss the woman's experiences, despite being completely ignorant of them.
I've known about it all along. I wish you you could see it, instead thinking you were talking about me. I haven't said a word about Cyrone Torbin's motives, character, or intent.
Do you really think this lawsuit won't just end up getting settled?
And yet you assume you know enough about him and this woman to judge their average lifes.
Do you think she really has a case? If she has no case, why would CVS settle?
I don't know if CVS will settle or not. I'm sure that if this is really an isolated incident for CVS, they won't need to settle.