What's new
By:

Would trading for Teague be skipping steps?

Skipping steps?

  • No, this is exactly what we need.

    Votes: 11 34.4%

  • Yes, Gotta keep the cake baking.

    Votes: 1 3.1%

  • Yes, if we gave to much up.

    Votes: 15 46.9%

  • No, we need to use these assets.

    Votes: 5 15.6%
  • Total voters
    32
Doublea

Doublea

Well-Known Member
I feel like this is one of the opportunities to get a relatively young player who has played at a high caliber recently. Isn't that what the jazz have been looking for with collecting their assets.

What do you guys think, should the jazz keep growing the talent they have and wait for other opportunities, or cash in now?
 
Jrue holiday would be better. But niether is skipping steps. As long as they don't have to lose exum, Lyles hay favors or gobert.
 
Doublea said:
I feel like this is one of the opportunities to get a relatively young player who has played at a high caliber recently. Isn't that what the jazz have been looking for with collecting their assets.

What do you guys think, should the jazz keep growing the talent they have and wait for other opportunities, or cash in now?
Click to expand...

I think one of the biggest hang ups in this deal getting done is, How much do you pay Teague on his next contract. Assuming, you'd at least have to consider keeping him if you give up assets. Will that disrupt keeping the other guys. How long before Exum takes over, and if soon, then you might be paying the backup too much.
 
b_line said:
Jrue holiday would be better. But niether is skipping steps. As long as they don't have to lose exum, Lyles hay favors or gobert.
Click to expand...
Hood?
 
Hack said:
I think one of the biggest hang ups in this deal getting done is, How much do you pay Teague on his next contract. Assuming, you'd at least have to consider keeping him if you give up assets. Will that disrupt keeping the other guys. How long before Exum takes over, and if soon, then you might be paying the backup too much.
Click to expand...

It would be a bummer if we traded Burks off just to see Teague leave in a year and a half.
 
I'm not going to get overly excited about one game, but Neto playing well makes it less pressing to add another PG. I'd still like to upgrade Burke, but I'm not offering a boatload to get Teague. Play hardball and let the Hawks come down on their asking price.

No Gobert, Favors, Lyles, Hayward, Hood, Burks, Exum or Neto. Probably not Withey either. Burke, Booker and picks are still game, but I'd rather use the assets to try to pry a younger, better player off of a struggling team and add him to our core group instead of renting a PG for high cost.
 
Ellis269 said:
I'm not going to get overly excited about one game, but Neto playing well makes it less pressing to add another PG. I'd still like to upgrade Burke, but I'm not offering a boatload to get Teague. Play hardball and let the Hawks come down on their asking price.

No Gobert, Favors, Lyles, Hayward, Hood, Burks, Exum or Neto. Probably not Withey either. Burke, Booker and picks are still game, but I'd rather use the assets to try to pry a younger, better player off of a struggling team and add him to our core group instead of renting a PG for high cost.
Click to expand...

Any examples of a player like this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top