Would you trade the 12th pick for.......

[Stifle Tower]

Is Mason Plumlee better than Kaminsky?

With Tomic a possibility, I think the Jazz MIGHT look to fill a different need. Dekker seems like a good fit to me. He could play either forward spot depending on matchups. That's good versatility to have. I could also see the Jazz trading back or even out if they got a future first. From Perrin's interviews, it doesn't sound like he - at least - thinks much of the players that will be available. He sees depth all the way back through the first round, but no all-stars.

 

[Hotdog]

Is Mason Plumlee better than Kaminsky?

With Tomic a possibility, I think the Jazz MIGHT look to fill a different need. Dekker seems like a good fit to me. He could play either forward spot depending on matchups. That's good versatility to have. I could also see the Jazz trading back or even out if they got a future first. From Perrin's interviews, it doesn't sound like he - at least - thinks much of the players that will be available. He sees depth all the way back through the first round, but no all-stars.

Kaminsky may be better. I'm not sure. But I think Mason Plumlee might be more of a sure thing.

I'm not saying it's great, but I'm pretty sure Plumlee would be a nice addition off the bench.

The draft is such a crap shoot. Who knows what we are going to get.

 

[Stifle Tower]

Kaminsky may be better. I'm not sure. But I think Mason Plumlee might be more of a sure thing.

I'm not saying it's great, but I'm pretty sure Plumlee would be a nice addition off the bench.

The draft is such a crap shoot. Who knows what we are going to get.

True. Maybe the Jazz make their pick and then trade the rights to that player later, once the situation with Tomic is resolved one way or the other,

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Plumlee sucks. This is a terrible idea.

 

[Handlogten's Heros]

An A+ for surprise... Did not see that one coming. An F for the trade... Just no sorry.

 

[Hotdog]

Why no love for Plumlee?

Have any of you watched him play or looked at the numbers he can put up? He's no slouch. He's a big athletic guy that can rebound very well and score.

What's the problem? We aren't looking for another starting big.

 

[Elizah Huge]

Portis sucks. This is a great idea.

Fixed.

 

[Elizah Huge]

Why no love for Plumlee?

Have any of you watched him play or looked at the numbers he can put up? He's no slouch. He's a big athletic guy that can rebound very well and score.

What's the problem? We aren't looking for another starting big.

I wouldn't mind it, atleast we know what were getting. Someone who consistently puts up 8 and 6 off the bench and is fun to watch.

 

[Handlogten's Heros]

He's a fine player but he's only cheap for a couple more years. He is old for a rookie... I'd say he's awfully close to his ceiling. I think we can get what he gives in free agency and get someone at 12 that might have more upside.

 

[NAOS]

I don't know if being 25 in this situation is a bad thing. We need help right now, and he's real cheap on that rookie deal. Drafting another 19 year old big could take forever to develop and help us.

I'm not saying it's the greatest deal, but for a backup big??

Maybe we could extract something else from them too if it's such a good deal for them

Was that your take away when the entire front office said the rebuild was "ahead of schedule"?

 

[Elizah Huge]

Was that your take away when the entire front office said the rebuild was "ahead of schedule"?

Wouldn't you rather have a known product instead of a project though?

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Wouldn't you rather have a known product instead of a project though?

We know Plumlee is an unskilled athletic big who struggles to hit FT's and can't do much else besides dunk?

Sounds like fun to watch. I'd rather have the 12th pick. Nearly every big in our draft range can give us similar production probably by year 2 (if not earlier) and improve from that in latter years.