What's new

Youngkin Wins.

Wait. I'm confused.

The rapist who was a man, self identified as a woman.
The rapist, who was a boy, apparently identifies as a boy.


Notice there is no mention of being trans. What's your evidence for the rapist being trans? The only "evidence" I've seen in that regard comes from Scott Smith, not the boy in question.
 
No ****? You're the one who made the claim that because of Virginia policies in the 1950's, is the reason voters voted the way they did in 2021. A stupid claim, as a majority of voters weren't even alive at this time.
Policies of the 1950s have tremendous effects decades later. It's important to learn about their impacts. Which is why Virginia's SBOE is providing educators with resources. And why many who grew up with these policies and their consequences don't want others to learn about them. It makes them feel uncomfortable.

And Boomers are one of the largest segments of our electorate. They're certainly more consistent voters (and will vote in an off year election like yesterday) than Millennials.


Those growing up in the 1950s and 1960s formed the largest part of the Virginia electorate yesterday, 60 percent. So I think you're done here.

Screen Shot 2021-11-03 at 12.58.04 PM.png

This is interesting. College graduates and Nonwhites (college and non-college) certainly heard the dog-whistling.
Screen Shot 2021-11-03 at 12.58.56 PM.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Policies of the 1950s have tremendous effects decades later. It's important to learn about their impacts. Which is why Virginia's SBOE is providing educators with resources.

And Boomers are one of the largest segments of our electorate. They're certainly more consistent voters (and will vote in an off year election like yesterday) than Millennials.


Those growing up in the 1950s and 1960s formed the largest part of the Virginia electorate yesterday, 60 percent. So I think you're done here.

View attachment 11333

This is interesting. College graduates and Nonwhites (college and non-college) certainly heard the dog-whistling.
View attachment 11334
How do you get 60% of the voters were "growing up" in the 50's and 60's? Do you know how to Math? The demographic you used has 50-64 y/o's in the same. How many 50 y/o's were born in 1950's and 60's moron?

I think we're done here.
 
I don't disagree, but it says right in the link that the educators work is informed by this literature, best practice and research and the links referenced are used "in the development of our work".

I don't have a problem with it being taught per se, but if it is being taught, I would like to know how it is being taught, as it is a broad theory. I have no problem with elementary school students being exposed to CRT, but it better be communicated in a way that is appropriate for young children, as even college students struggle with it as it can be an emotional topic.

I personally think that while CRT was part of the issue, parents tend to get pissed off when a candidate says parents have no role in directing the education of their children. That statement was concerning, although, again, I understand where McAuliffe was coming from, but the way he stated it I think enraged a lot of voters against him, and Youngkin astutely jumped all over it.
This is not intended as a challenge to you, as I think you accurately described the sentiment that helped get Youngkin elected.

So parents were upset that they would have no role in their children's education so they elected the guy that is going to outright ban a topic from being taught?
 
How do you get 60% of the voters were "growing up" in the 50's and 60's? Do you know how to Math? The demographic you used has 50-64 y/o's in the same. How many 50 y/o's were born in 1950's and 60's moron?

I think we're done here.
You should try reading the chart provided.
 
Are you truly so ignorant that you don't know white supremacists have a long history of supporting minority people who have supported them?
I'm sure Hispanic voters will come rushing back to the not-at-all-racist Progressive caucus after voting 55% for Youngkin versus 45% for McAuliffe now that Progressives have labeled them "white supremacists". It is strange they ever left the Progressive caucus given the outreach where Progressives labeled their native language as bigoted and demand they identify themselves as Latinx rather than Lantina or Latino. I do remember how you said you heard a Latinx on NPR who spoke for all Latinx when saying how much they enjoyed being corrected on language by their moral betters in the Progressive caucus.

I will say that with the new Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, and majority of Hispanic voters in Virginia, it is nice to see how diverse and accepting the white supremacists of Virginia have become.
 
You should try reading the chart provided.
And onto the block list you go. Gave you another chance and you blew it.

This is why we can't ever discuss anything beyond the surface. There's a certain level of vulnerability that one needs to show. Instead, you refuse to do that, refuse to be open to learning about facts, and maintain living in your alt universe. Sad

Isn't it amazing how folks drowning in right wing disinformation keep this country stuck in first gear? Whether it's covid/vaccines, health care, economics, election "fraud", LGBT community, or race? Sigh
 
I read it. You obviously don't know simple mathematics or understand how to read it.

Your claim of 60% of the population who voted in Virginia yesterday growing up in the 50's-60's was false.

Moron
How so?

Here's the electorate breakdown.

If you were born in 1950 you'd be 71 this year and in the 26 percent category. If you were born in 1960, you'd be 61 this year and in the 34 percent category.

Basic math, 34+26=60. The next closest demo is those 40-49 years of age, but they only constitute 18 percent of the electorate. Overwhelmingly Boomers still make up the largest part of our electorate. Boomers grew up with segregation. This shouldn't be a surprise to you.

Do you not know how to read these things?

Screen Shot 2021-11-03 at 12.58.04 PM.png
 
075FC40B-AAC2-4D34-84CD-95C91B85248A.jpegI seriously doubt it ; but I'm hoping the VA Gov race finally puts an end to the democratic party trotting out these old, milquetoast, middle of the road, centrist, Clinton-like candidates.

You need a more compelling reason to win an election other than "I'm not a republican; but don't worry I'll just kinda act like one once I get into office."
You have plenty of agreement there
 
I would just add that I'm a firm believer in that I think children and young adults should learn both sides of many debates and conflicts so they can inform their own opinions vs. being scripted. Any echo chamber where a person only hears one side of the story is destined to believe that it's the only truth.

And yeah, there's not a lot of good reasons for something such as the Holocaust, but people need to understand what brought us to that point in history and how it became a thing rather than it simply just being 'bad' per se.

Adults sure seem to care about CRT a lot more than kids do as they'd rather be playing Xbox, hanging out with friends or trying to impress the opposite sex in embarrassing ways - and we all know it because we were young once.
 
How so?

Here's the electorate breakdown.

If you were born in 1950 you'd be 71 this year and in the 26 percent category. If you were born in 1960, you'd be 61 this year and in the 34 percent category.

Basic math, 34+26=60. The next closest demo is those 40-49 years of age, but they only constitute 18 percent of the electorate. Overwhelmingly Boomers still make up the largest part of our electorate. Boomers grew up with segregation. This shouldn't be a surprise to you.

Do you not know how to read these things?

View attachment 11336
Once again....Your claim, that 60% of those who voted yesterday grew up in the 50's and 60's is false. When was someone who is 51 in Virginia born? I'll help you, they were born in 70 or 71, therefore could not have grown up in the 50's and 60's making your moronic claim false. Even if someone is 55, that would make them born in 67 or 68. Does someone who is 2 years old "grow up" in 68-69....moron
 
Back
Top