CitizenofCapua
Well-Known Member
Actually, George Hayward thing wouldn't be over 10% in the way it appears to me. Maybe he is the one who is into this issue and keep using selective perception through Jazz fans' tweets.
It didn't draw my attention either and i dont see why he finds these two players incomparable. Jazz fanz got pretty good damn reasons to compare Hayward with George;
1. One of them drafted one spot earlier than the other one.
2. They're playing at same position, they're at same age and they have about the same size.
3. Last season George played 9 minutes more and attempted 4 fg more. Per 36 they got pretty similar numbers.
4. George had a bigger role in Pacers than Hayward had in Jazz. With vets gone his role will increase and this year he will take more responsibility. And as a bonus no more Alfense this year.
5. George's coach is Vogel and Hayward's coach is Corbin. Responsibility is not for only player to take its also for coaches to give and Hayward definetly got a disadventage here. We know Corbin's unreletless love for the vets. While Corbin giving much more minutes than they expected to all goners, Vogel was trying to create a dynamic/young, contentious college like team in Indiana since day one.
So yeah i agree with he is just being a prick for mocking questions about George/Hayward comprasion, they're closer than he thought and its definetly a worth to talk topic. So Jazz fans should keep tweeting about it insistently and increasingly.. %50 is not good enough.