What's new

Zach Lowe tells Utah (and a couple other teams) what to do in free agency

I'm not sure but I think we can't trade some of those dudes until December

We can trade them whenever we want to... not sure of the guarantee dates on those guys though.

DL knew what he was doing. Booker is a non guaranteed (according to locke) from 07/01/15 thru 07/15/15. The rest are all tradeable after 90 days. That 90 day hold was up the day before the draft. Jazz could trade 8 millions in contracts that can all be cut by 07/15/15.

In short, they are all tradeable and non guaranteed.
 
You aren't listening to what I'm saying.

I've clearly said that moving on from Burks is an option. I have my doubts about his fit and talent.

My argument is that if you really like Burks, then you have to think twice about hiring his replacement.

You don't just add players just because you can.

Have a ****ing plan man.

Utah probably should have passed on Rudy. Then Kanter would still be here and happy as a clam.
 
As stoked mentioned earlier, the obvious deal Utah should be working on is Burke + Booker + picks to grab a significant player in trade. Use that cap space by taking back more salary than we send out.
 
Also, if we add Middleton, that dude is 23 and his cake is definitely still baking, so it would still be baking the cake.

Do you have him playing the 2? The 3? What happens to Hayward's, Alec's, and Hood's minutes?

Are you one of the guys who wants Burks playing 70% of his minutes at the backup-1 as well?
 
Also, if we add Middleton, that dude is 23 and his cake is definitely still baking, so it would still be baking the cake.
 
To me, Middleton is a 3/4-- a position of strength. I know he plays minutes at SG, but I can't really access his defensive ratings against 2-guards (gonna assume it isn't particularly great)-- not only that, but we're deep at SG as well.


I just think that we need to come to terms with three things:


1) our enormous amounts of cap-room does NOT need to be utilized THIS OFFSEASON. Guess what-- we have until February to take on "massive contracts", for pennies. We can pull a Boston, and grab the likes of an Isaiah Thomas for effectively nothing but cap-space. This way, we get from October to February to evaluate our baking-cake, and decide whether we are better off giving up on a giving prospect and addressing a positional need, or if continued nurturing brings us closer to a championship that we all so desire. Think about how many decent players that are gonna be unloaded in preparation for the big-FA sweepstakes (as is literally being done right now a la Danny Green, etc.)
2) the team with the most talent =/= the team that wins. Chemistry matters-- every NBA player will tell you so.
3) there is a spectrum of benefit between asset accumulation and nurturing already-acquired assets. The extreme of either is never the approach you want to take.

We are uniquely in a position where we don't really know what we have with Burks, and we are expecting huge gains from
Hood (the dudes adding a ****ing post-game for God's sake)-- putting either player in roles where they won't succeed could completely nullify any positives brought forth by the likes of Carroll or Green.



Personally, I'm much more willing to hold out until February before we make big swings in roster moves, unless it's to buy-out Tomic, or add some other backup-5. It's interesting that people are unwilling to remove Exum from starting, yet they're willing to jerk around the likes of Hood and Burks.
 
We need to stop buying cake ingredients, and invest in potatoes which are more versatile.
They are easy to bake, fry, boil or mash and all are good.
Potatoes can play multiple positions.
They also stay with you longer than cake does.

#potatoesftw
 
Do you have him playing the 2? The 3? What happens to Hayward's, Alec's, and Hood's minutes?

Are you one of the guys who wants Burks playing 70% of his minutes at the backup-1 as well?

head-desk-bartlett.gif
 
Back
Top