What's new
By:

White Chocolate Just Compared Carmello Anthony to Stockton and Malone

One player isn't better than another simply because one won more rings. That's like Kenny Smith claiming he's better than Payton on Inside the NBA because he won 2 rings.
 
Siro said:
One player isn't better than another simply because one won more rings. That's like Kenny Smith claiming he's better than Payton on Inside the NBA) because he won 2 rings.
Click to expand...

Yes, not for all players. Some players simply got unlucky and didn't win.

Then there are players who play style doesnt allow them to win it all. That is what Carmello is, which is why I feel it's blasphemous to compare the failings of Stockton and Malone to Anthony's. They are completely different.
 
Cy said Draymond is better than Carmelo because he has a ring. That's how this started.

/thread
 
How is this comparing Carmelo to them? My post says nothing about that. Just said Draymond was better because he has a ring. Like Cy said.
 
White Chocolate said:
How is this comparing Carmelo to them? My post says nothing about that. Just said Draymond was better because he has a ring. Like Cy said.
Click to expand...

Our conversation was about Melo and Green then you brought up Stockton and Malone to make a comparison Perma-ban.
 
Reminds me of a time when I made a thread about NAOS and having Rudy's head on a girls body in his signature.



I wonder how this thread will be received.
 
Contextual. If you're building a team, Melo is a better player to build around than Draymond, no arguments. Draymond would have anemic percentages as a first option.

If you have elite scoring, and playmaking options already set in stone, Draymond is the far-superior 3rd fiddle who does everything you ask him to do, and fits better with scorers.

This ain't rocket science, morons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top