I imagine you might mean this , say, as the simple consequence of following the logic of a set of realities, but I don't think it really works out like that. Imposing some standard education on people will produce rebels unless we medicate the water or lobotomize or something, making educational measures actually effective.
I think we have to just accept individual decisions, but maybe use some good standards in teaching personal decision-making, and live with the variance in outcomes as the price of individual freedom. That leads to me being in Dal's camp pretty much. I don't think we can really achieve a single version of the method though, and we have to accept the reality of divergent thinking among teaching folks, even parents. Maybe ideas like religious tolerance and freedom will prove to be better than a society driven by ideological or legal or educational imperatives?
It's pretty impossible to create a perfect world with imperfect thinking and free humans. Tolerance will be necessary. Maybe living with freedom means we can't just pass a law to fix everything. As rhetorical or bombastic as I may be, I think the decision is still a personal one, not a legal or political one. Doesn't stop me from trying to tell people we should not put life on a higher priority than convenience.
The world has always been limited by technology and human beliefs. I'm just not ready for government to step in and impose a "final solution" on us.
sarcasm, it was sarcasm.