What's new

Sanders starting to kick some HC... whatever

bjwsan

Well-Known Member
Latest polls out of New Hampshire should be causing some serious pantsuit stress... you know, stress coming out of... wherever...

From Boston Herald; "Sanders leads Clinton 44-37 percent among likely Democratic primary voters, the first time the heavily favored Clinton has trailed in the 2016 primary campaign, according to the poll of 442 Granite-Staters... The live interview phone poll was conducted Aug. 7-10 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.7 percentage points.

Clearly outside of the margin of error... I'm seeing that crown start to slide....
 
Sanders just pulled a crowd of 28,000 in LA and right before that he had pulled a crowd of 19,000.

The public are realizing that Clinton is absolutely untrustworthy.
 
Untrustworthy perhaps for some. I just think she is un inspiring. Rather dull and dry, and she has a way of talking down to people. She is seen as a career politician who has got rich off her 'public service'.

I just don't think the millennials, or the working class connect with her.


All that said, there is no way the DNC lets Sanders make it out of convention ahead of Hillary.
 
Untrustworthy perhaps for some. I just think she is un inspiring. Rather dull and dry, and she has a way of talking down to people. She is seen as a career politician who has got rich off her 'public service'.

I just don't think the millennials, or the working class connect with her.


All that said, there is no way the DNC lets Sanders make it out of convention ahead of Hillary.

All the uninspiring and what not aside. Do you think she is trustworthy at all?
 
my default position is that most politicians aren't trustworthy. A few of them strike me as less trustworthy than others. Hillary seems to me to be capable of saying or doing anything in order to meet her goals.

Trustworthy? Not one bit.
 
Untrustworthy perhaps for some. I just think she is un inspiring. Rather dull and dry, and she has a way of talking down to people. She is seen as a career politician who has got rich off her 'public service'.

+1 on the Uninspiring... even her covert affairs are f'n uninspiring... 'convenience' 'one, not two devices...' I almost believed her because I thought no one would be that dumb with their lies... but I'm clearly wrong... she is that dull, dry and dumb.

I can't stand listening to news clips of her rallies or interview for more than 3 minutes... (not JUST because of a different viewpoint... I listen to all you guys!!!) it's just that she bores the hell out of me and her delivery is ... uhm... oh, yea... uninspiring.

Can you imagine being an employee of GE or Cisco and having to sit there and listen to this? Or the guy who paid for it... OMG... Or best yet... $451K to Salesforce.com... I bet the ROI on that, through improved performance... is, uh... ... ... hell, by now, it's a sunk cost... especially if she doesn't get in...
 
Sanders/?? v Rubio/Kasich for the presidency?

I say Rubio/Kasich as that may be the GOPs best chance of winning (young, handsome, latino senator from the swingstate of FL and an older, white gov. from the swingstate of Ohio) based on current candidates.
 
All that said, there is no way the DNC lets Sanders make it out of convention ahead of Hillary.

Agreed w/ you, and even recently said to someone claiming it was going to be Clinton/Bush... 60/40... so I gave Clinton a better chance of getting in than Bush...
Right now... I don't know. Think the turn yesterday on the email issue has gone to a dangerous level... and Bernie is going to put pressure on her... so she will start to respond... and, sorry for those who like HC... when she talks, she looses points... so this is going downhill, pretty fast...

I'm thinking about placing bets on Howard Schultz... Agree that Bernie ain't going to make it... but thinking HC is DOA, so DEMs grab HS, and serve up a new tasty brew...
 
I say Rubio/Kasich as that may be the GOPs best chance of winning (young, handsome, latino senator from the swingstate of FL and an older, white gov. from the swingstate of Ohio) based on current candidates.

I'm OK w/ 1/2 your ticket... but think Rubio is NOT ready for prime time...
Fiorina/Rubio, if you want a broad based appeal, or Fiorina/Kasich if you want political experience added to Fiorina ticket...
 
I'm OK w/ 1/2 your ticket... but think Rubio is NOT ready for prime time...
Fiorina/Rubio, if you want a broad based appeal, or Fiorina/Kasich if you want political experience added to Fiorina ticket...

There we go with the MsMo, what in the world is 'prime time' in your view? And political experience for that matter, this is a race about ideology, no experience needed.
 
I'm OK w/ 1/2 your ticket... but think Rubio is NOT ready for prime time...
Fiorina/Rubio, if you want a broad based appeal, or Fiorina/Kasich if you want political experience added to Fiorina ticket...

I think any combination of Rubio/Fiorina/Kasich would work with the exception of Kasich only being a VP. Broadens the GOP base (women and/or latinos) some, better chance at crucial swing state or two, not the typical same old white guy, more relatable (look at Rubio's life story)...
 
Sanders/?? v Rubio/Kasich for the presidency?

I say Rubio/Kasich as that may be the GOPs best chance of winning (young, handsome, latino senator from the swingstate of FL and an older, white gov. from the swingstate of Ohio) based on current candidates.

I think it's gunna be a Fiorina/Perry ticket

Could be Rubio at either Potus/VP
 
Back
Top