What's new
By:

Current NBA Draft Final Four: Framer vs. Hack

Who would win in a 7 game series?

  • Total voters
    24
  • Poll closed .
Hack doesn't have the battle-tested clutch gritty dudes like I bring.

Davis, Favors, Parsons and Martin have never started for teams that won a playoff series. Not NBA Finals. A playoff series. Ever. These guys have never started on a team that won one stinkin' playoff series. And Irving did but let's face it, Lebron could carry a bunch of paraplegics to the NBA Finals.

I'd win in 4-5 games.
 
Last edited:
Hack said:
You do know that the game is won by the best players right?

You had THE very best player in Lebron and traded him away. I have the best player in this matchup ( Davis). So that would suggest that my team would have a very strong chance at winning my matchup. I also have the the best guard too. So 2 of the very best in the matchup. But yet, it's inconceivable and ridiculous that my team will win.

Are you sure you are part of an elite minority that knows basketball better than most people?
Click to expand...

Um....LeBron's team didn't win either.


OOOPS!!


edit: had to thank you for so brilliantly proving my point. I don't think I have ever seen that done so well before.
 
Poll was 10-2 before I started piling in on Hack. Excellent ;)
 
Hack said:
I guess since the Jazz didn't win 30 games the year before then everyone on the Jazz sucked. Including Favors, Rudy, and Hayward.


Dalamon bringing the full proof logic. It just can't be beat.
Click to expand...

Favors or Hayward both would not be good on playoff teams in their 2nd year.

If we are talking about LaVine and Shabazz in their 4th year, then maybe you have a point.
 
Also, while my bench may not be winning an NBA championship as starters, Hack has the Wolves bench which couldn't win 20 last year as BENCH players. The Bench one of the worst teams in the NBA. All my guys are at least starters. The benches aren't even close.
 
Hack's big three of Davis, Irving, and Favors is better than anyone else's in this draft.
 
Cy said:
Favors or Hayward both would not be good on playoff teams in their 2nd year.

If we are talking about LaVine and Shabazz in their 4th year, then maybe you have a point.
Click to expand...
What are you talking about?

The season that got us Exum would not be Favors and Hayward's 2nd year.

Good job though.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Um....LeBron's team didn't win either.


OOOPS!!


edit: had to thank you for so brilliantly proving my point. I don't think I have ever seen that done so well before.
Click to expand...

Lol.

Ya? What point would that be?


Think about it real hard, then get back to me. You don't want to rush this one. Trust me.
 
So I brought up all these points against Hack and everybody ignores it, then Dala brings up worse arguments and people listen? This is why this boards basketball intellect is subpar, it's all a followers mentality. Somebody you trusts says something, and you believe it because yall can't think for yourselves.

With that said, Hack's team is better, and having a scorer like Martin as your 5th option isn't that bad, considering a lot of his defensive inequities are neutralized by two good post defenders (see Burke's defensive numbers with Favors/Gobert as evidence).
 
Howard said:
So I brought up all these points against Hack and everybody ignores it, then Dala brings up worse arguments and people listen? This is why this boards basketball intellect is subpar, it's all a followers mentality. Somebody you trusts says something, and you believe it because yall can't think for yourselves.

With that said, Hack's team is better, and having a scorer like Martin as your 5th option isn't that bad, considering a lot of his defensive inequities are neutralized by two good post defenders (see Burke's defensive numbers with Favors/Gobert as evidence).
Click to expand...

Good post.

But I really don't think people trusts Dalamon's opinion and are following him.

Dalamon is pretty smart at a lot of stuff, but basketball is not one of them. Talking to him about basketball is like talking to a girl, a little kid, or a nerd who never played sports. His naiveness about the sports is obvious when he talks about it. At least to people who know basketball. He is below the honeytennis mission accomplished line in my opinion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top