Miggs
Well-Known Member
Pleiss is guaranteed next year too.
I said able bodies.
I would say Burke can almost play some SG next to players like Exum and Burks, so there might be room for a PG...I'd also say you could look at a SG to develop because Hood can easily flex to SF, so can Alec.
Maybe for the pg. Exum will be back. Neto should be better. We have Burke of course too. So all that makes me lean toward no but if we could get some 34 year old vet who is willing to just be a leader, sit the bench and play 15 minutes in case of injury, then I'd say yes. Kirk Hinrich who's a UFA comes to mind. Maybe Jarrett Jack if we're looking for more of an offensive-minded guy. He too is a FA. Regarding the 2. Slide Burke to SG all you want but then we'd have Burke, Hood, Burks, Hayward, and the draft pick you mentioned who can play the 2. That's unnecessary redundancy.
Agreed but I think this is what Lyles could become.A 3/4 versatile type near 6'10 that can play on-ball defense would fit IMO.
A 4/5 works. So does a pure 4 as a development project if Lyles shows he's ready for backup minutes by the end of the season. (JONATHAN JEANNE!!)
A pure 5 to develop makes tons of sense too. Good young C's are great pieces to trade for proven vets, there will always be a scarcity of talented 7-footers, many teams don't have even one.. Obviously we've all seen the upside of taking a flier on Gobert. The Jazz are still in a position to horde assets, IMO developing another C to showcase and drum up trade value for behind Rudy, is a no-brainer.
Agreed. Big time. There also seems to be a decent amount of these 4/5 types this draft.