Trade for Zach Lavine

[Hotdog]

This is how I feel. We need to take a risk. You can't just play it safe if you wanna win it all. The upside of LaVine is obviously higher than Hood's. He's three years younger and 10 times the athlete; he's already putting up similar numbers as Hood.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

This is why I like Spy.

He some of the smarter basketball minds on JazzFanz. Has a good eye for talent.

 

[NAOS]

I'm gonna go play and splash around in the Jabari Parker thread. Because it's fun to participate in the wanking of wondering about whether a young player, on a rookie contract, with good upside will somehow be dealt.... even though that ish never happens.

Maybe we can merge these threads? Mods?

Also Hood > LaVine

 

[NAOS]

I can't wait for Hack to bump this thread in 3 years and claim that we totallllly could have snagged LaVine for Withey, a first, and Carlos Boozer's soul. Gonna be riotous, brosephs.

 

[Hotdog]

I'm gonna go play and splash around in the Jabari Parker thread. Because it's fun to participate in the wanking of wondering about whether a young player, on a rookie contract, with good upside will somehow be dealt.... even though that ish never happens.

Maybe we can merge these threads? Mods?

Also Hood > LaVine

Maybe we should go splash around in your lob threads eh? Because trading for Paul George is so reasonable right? Yeeaahhh. Riiiigght bro.


So according to NAOS guis, it's a lot easier to trade for Paul George then it is to trade for Zach Lavine.

lmao. holy cow you are crazy.

 

[spycam1]

I'm gonna go play and splash around in the Jabari Parker thread. Because it's fun to participate in the wanking of wondering about whether a young player, on a rookie contract, with good upside will somehow be dealt.... even though that ish never happens.

Maybe we can merge these threads? Mods?

Also Hood > LaVine

Well, if you think Hood (also on a rookie contract) is better than LaVine, then Minny possibly being willing to swap them shouldn't seem so far-fetched.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

[NAOS]

Maybe we should go splash around in your lob threads eh? Because trading for Paul George is so reasonable right? Yeeaahhh. Riiiigght bro.


So according to NAOS guis, it's a lot easier to trade for Paul George then it is to trade for Zach Lavine.

lmao. holy cow you are crazy.

this may shock you, but you've misunderstood the point of those threads. Right? Wow. Yr dumb.

 

[Hotdog]

I can't wait for Hack to bump this thread in 3 years and claim that we totallllly could have snagged LaVine for Withey, a first, and Carlos Boozer's soul. Gonna be riotous, brosephs.

I can't wait for you to bump the "we could have had Lillard thread in 3 years. Cause that could have happened.

Here I'll bump them for you.

 

[NAOS]

Well, if you think Hood (also on a rookie contract) is better than LaVine, then Minny possibly being willing to swap them shouldn't seem so far-fetched.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

How many 2nd year players with good upside change teams? Acceptable answers include when a 2nd-year player is traded for another 2nd-year player.

 

[Hotdog]

Well, if you think Hood (also on a rookie contract) is better than LaVine, then Minny possibly being willing to swap them shouldn't seem so far-fetched.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

Don't bother talking about logic and reason with him. He doesn't know what to do with it.

 

[NAOS]

There's an MCW joke in here somewhere

 

[Hotdog]

How many 2nd year players with good upside change teams? Acceptable answers include when a 2nd-year player is traded for another 2nd-year player.

You don't get to decide what's acceptable answers. There are no rules against trading 2nd year players. If the teams can come to a deal, then they can come to a deal. simple as that. Stop trying to throw in imaginary road blocks.

 

[NAOS]

You don't get to decide what's acceptable answers. There are no rules against trading 2nd year players. If the teams can come to a deal, then they can come to a deal. simple as that. Stop trying to throw in imaginary road blocks.

so asking for precedent is too much? lol