Trade idea + new depth chart

[Hotdog]

decent idea at the time. I stand behind it. Wallace was a legit piece at the time. Morrow still has value today.

lolololol

 

[Hotdog]

Hey guis, just Remember that when NAOS tries to talk down to you and thinks he's smarter than you, there 100's, literally 100's of bad ideas he's put out there in the past. They are really easy to find. Just grab that mirror, and give him a look.

If I had a nickel for every bad idea NAOS has had, well then...you know the rest.

 

[NUMBERICA]

Yeah, but this would've been a really good trade (for the Jazz, at least), so... uhhh... K.

 

[NAOS]

Yeah, but this would've been a really good trade (for the Jazz, at least), so... uhhh... K.

but what about losing AK and all those minutes from Tomic?

 

[Siro]

I don't understand why Hack thinks getting Morrow for nothing was a laughable idea.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

I don't understand why Hack thinks getting Morrow for nothing was a laughable idea.

Well he did include "pick(s)". I think losing picks for an overpaid Wallace would be a bad thing.

 

[NAOS]

Well he did include "pick(s)". I think losing picks for an overpaid Wallace would be a bad thing.

Wallace still had value. Evidence: how many other times was he traded?

 

[Siro]

Well he did include "pick(s)". I think losing picks for an overpaid Wallace would be a bad thing.

What was the pick at that time? Somewhere in the teens? So Morrow and serviceable 2011 Gerald Wallace (14 pts 7 rbs at that time) for a pick. You can argue whether that is a good deal for Utah, but Hack is bumping a 5 year old thread as if it is just laughable.