D
Deleted member 848
Guest
Frank's right. How many 7-footers with elite D are there in NBA history who routinely drop 5-7 assists on any given night?
If the Jazz/Warriors swapped Curry/Burks, which team would be better?
- Thread starter JazzFever
- Start date
Frank's right. How many 7-footers with elite D are there in NBA history who routinely drop 5-7 assists on any given night?
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
Gobert is the better defender-- but man is Bogut an unreal fit with that team.
Bawse Dawg
Well-Known Member
Bogut averages 2.1 assists per game? What am I missing here?
Not Bogut since he can only play 20 mpg. He has dropped 5 assist or more only twice.
Bawse Dawg
Well-Known Member
Yo Fish that was homer AF bro. Green is much better than Faves. Hayward>Thompson? HUH!?!?
Based on what?
Based on what?
Hayward is way better than Thompson.
Bawse Dawg
Well-Known Member
Then show me the stats.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
****ing lol, dude.
Based on almost everything except set-shots. Better passer. Defender. Go-to option. Rebounder. Way, way better handles.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
****ing Rodney Hood is on his way to becoming better than Klay, and we got ppl here saying Haywards worse than him.
Umm, nearly the exact same points per shot.
Gets to the FT line more.
More assist
More rebounds
More steals
Better PER
Does it all while being the #1 focus of the opposing team on an injury riddled team with little offensive help from others for stretches of the season.
Doesnt have Steph Curry or Green passing him the ball.
It's pretty obvious.
Thompson would struggle mightily in Hayward's role. Hayward could fill Thompson's role, maybe not as good as Thompson, but would be close.
Bawse Dawg
Well-Known Member
GSW wouldn't trade Klay for Hayward in a million years.
I'd settle for a tie. But go outside Utah and see what people would say about those two. Klay has one elite skill Gordon has none.
The funny thing is that the raw stats say Hayward is better, so it's nt even like we have to connect the dots. But if you do connect the dots, it's even more clear Hayward > Thompson.
Bawsdog is developing this niche of the negative nancy.
Bawse Dawg
Well-Known Member
Dalabro while you're at it you still have to explain how Bogut is better than Gobert and how he dishes out 5-7 assists per night while averaging 2.
Of course they wouldn't. Why would they trade a guaranteed fit for Hayward (who has less years on his deal)? It'd be an unneccesary risk. That doesn't mean Thompson > Hayward.
Bawse Dawg
Well-Known Member
I'll cede for now. But still disagree with 'way' better.
I love Hayward. Don't be thinking otherwise.
I love Hayward. Don't be thinking otherwise.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
because of team fit and chemistry, doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that. They prolly wouldn't even trade Barnes for Melo.
What you should ask yourself is: ask every GM, if building a team, whether they want Hayward or Klay.
Ah yes so Tony Allen is also better because of that one elite skill of his!
Go outside Utah where no one watches Jazz basketball and know Hayawrd as the guy who missed the shot vs. Duke. Yes, real educated opinions against one of the most visible teams in the league.
Bawse Dawg
Well-Known Member
And don't be calling me negative. I'm making threads about how bright the future is.
The only thing I'm being negative about at the moment is keeping all of our players in Utah for the future.
The only thing I'm being negative about at the moment is keeping all of our players in Utah for the future.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
He fits their offense better, never said Bogut was better. Gobert is obvs the superior player.
Just like Hayward is the better player, but how Klay suits em better.
You are definitely one of the more negative posters on the board. Someone has to fill that niche though.