What's new

If the Jazz/Warriors swapped Curry/Burks, which team would be better?

Burks is the best non-essential piece to me that we could lose and still be a championship team when adding a superstar.

I think we could lose Burks or hood too.

Add curry to Hayward, favors, Gobert and Burks and I think we can win a chip
 
I think we could lose hood too.

3uwtud.jpg
 
Do you think hood is better than curry already?

You don't think adding the best player in the nba to the jazz without hood makes us contenders?

Curry = curry
Burks = barnes (maybe barnes is a bit better)
Hayward > thompson
Favors = green. (Eh green probably better than favors I guess)
Gobert >> bogut

I think adding curry and losing hood that the jazz contend for a title right now
 
Do you think hood is better than curry already?

You don't think adding the best player in the nba to the jazz without hood makes us contenders?

Curry = curry
Burks = barnes (maybe barnes is a bit better)
Hayward > thompson
Favors = green. (Eh green probably better than favors I guess)
Gobert >> bogut

I think adding curry and losing hood that the jazz contend for a title right now

Lebron James and Kevin Durant are both better than Curry.

Thompson is better than Hayward, but the synergy effect of having Curry might make Hayward better as Hayward is a better 2nd or 3rd option.

The main problem is there isn't sound statistical evidence showing that Burks adds value. As of now he's more of a stat padder than anything.

However, Hood most certainly contributes to the win column. Replace Burks with Hood and I think we are a contender for a title right now. But not the other way around.
 
Lebron James and Kevin Durant are both better than Curry.

Thompson is better than Hayward, but the synergy effect of having Curry might make Hayward better as Hayward is a better 2nd or 3rd option.

The main problem is there isn't sound statistical evidence showing that Burks adds value. As of now he's more of a stat padder than anything.

However, Hood most certainly contributes to the win column. Replace Burks with Hood and I think we are a contender for a title right now. But not the other way around.
We disagree
 
Considering that the Warriors are already one of the best defensive teams in the league and little of that has to do with Curry, that Thompson AND Green are more effective floor-spaces than a single person that we have on this team, they're a team that runs an offense, and they pass better as a team, it's The Warriors. This isn't the mid-2000's Cavs we're talking about.
 
Do you think hood is better than curry already?

You don't think adding the best player in the nba to the jazz without hood makes us contenders?

Curry = curry
Burks = barnes (maybe barnes is a bit better)
Hayward > thompson
Favors = green. (Eh green probably better than favors I guess)
Gobert >> bogut

I think adding curry and losing hood that the jazz contend for a title right now

????
 
Considering that the Warriors are already one of the best defensive teams in the league and little of that has to do with Curry, that Thompson AND Green are more effective floor-spaces than a single person that we have on this team, they're a team that runs an offense, and they pass better as a team, it's The Warriors. This isn't the mid-2000's Cavs we're talking about.

They can even space with Iggy on the floor. Bogut's offensive facilitation... That is one of the best put together teams of all time.
 
They can even space with Iggy on the floor. Bogut's offensive facilitation... That is one of the best put together teams of all time.

Frank's right. How many 7-footers with elite D are there in NBA history who routinely drop 5-7 assists on any given night?
 
Gobert is the better defender-- but man is Bogut an unreal fit with that team.
 
Back
Top