This is ridiculous. He had 12 points 20 rebounds and 6 blocks last night. He is averaging a double double on the season and 2.5 blocks. So after a season where he has been super consistent, you would trade him for a player with less upside?
LMao at thosenwho say NO, Homerism at its finest... Gobert isn't even an all star but you wouldn't trade for the number one pick. SMH
How did that game turn out for the Jazz? Or the season? Im not saying he's a bum, I'm just not as bullish on Gobert as I once was. His offense limitations will handicap his team every time. And I'm not sure how favors and Gobert play together and win a high percentage of games.
Increasingly it appears the Jazz are going nowhere with this rebuild. If a team calls offering a top 5 pick for Gobert or Hayward the Jazz probably ought to listen.
You do know that being an all star is virtually worthless when talking about the value of a player? Right. The all star system is broken, and relying on that to assess his value is ****ing stupid.
Broken? Only the starters are voted in and the fans usually vote in guys who would make the team anyway. Kobe was the only byproduct of a "broken" system this year.
I'd trade him for Towns or Simmons in a heartbeat.I wouldn't.
I would, however, trade him for Karl Towns.
Well the question is for #1 so you don't need the class to be anything special as long as you can secure a player superior to what Rudy can give. I would say no too though.I don't think this is a very good draft class, so I'm gonna go with No...