NAOS
Well-Known Member
How is this relevant?
a good question...... but, then again, in the context of this thread relevance doesn't seem to apply.
How is this relevant?
What? This makes no sense. What do you figure his best offer will be next summer? Do you think there's any chance he re-signs for 75% of some other team's offer?
Ah, I see. Makes sense. Which teams potentially offer him $25mil/year?4 years and 100 mil+.. I'd be weary to do anything over 3 years 70mil.
As I've said before, Hayward being a dedicated video game player, leads me to believe think he'll look to grab as much $$$ as possible. So no I don;t think there's any chance he re-signs for 75%.
If it was up to me I'd trade him this offseason or at the deadline... (see the OP..)
Hayward being a dedicated video game player leads me to believe he'll look to grab as much $$$ as possible.
Ah, I see. Makes sense. Which teams potentially offer him $25mil/year?
teh ****??
For the sake of discussion, let's say Washington is actually willing to trade Wall. Here's what they ask for: Favors or Hayward + Exum + 2 first-round picks. I'm not saying that's a reflection of Wall's ACTUAL value, or that he's that much better than the outgoing pieces; I do think that Washington would only part ways with Wall for a large loot.
I tend to agree.
Did that not ring true last time he hit the market?? lets see how it goes next summer..
I'm an old school MMO (Everquest) veteran btw, Once I got older I became quite convinced the average people playing games of certain types are influenced to be greedy.
For the sake of discussion, let's say Washington is actually willing to trade Wall. Here's what they ask for: Favors or Hayward + Exum + 2 first-round picks. I'm not saying that's a reflection of Wall's ACTUAL value, or that he's that much better than the outgoing pieces; I do think that Washington would only part ways with Wall for a large loot.