What's new

If Jazz went 19-10 w/Dante starting and held opponents to 89ppg,why the doubt in Exum

tleikheen

Well-Known Member
We understand the ACL tear but he's only 20 yrs old and by all accounts is expected to be 100% and is looking more physically healthy.Dante went straight from Australian high school to the NBA.He never was around the NBA before then was playing in it.Yet with all that lack of experience he excelled on the defensive side of the court and Jazz started winning by defense.

Yet some Jazz fans want him learning behind a more "experienced PG",looking like the 19-10 record with Exum starting is not believable or never happened.Jazz haven't come close to matching the defense or the Wins since.....Making the Question ,Do Wins count.

Because the front office and his team mates stand firmly behind Exum in thinking they do.
 
We understand the ACL tear but he's only 20 yrs old and by all accounts is expected to be 100% and is looking more physically healthy.Dante went straight from Australian high school to the NBA.He never was around the NBA before then was playing in it.Yet with all that lack of experience he excelled on the defensive side of the court and Jazz started winning by defense.

Yet some Jazz fans want him learning behind a more "experienced PG",looking like the 19-10 record with Exum starting is not believable or never happened.Jazz haven't come close to matching the defense or the Wins since.....Making the Question ,Do Wins count.

Because the front office and his team mates stand firmly behind Exum in thinking they do.

Those are gaudy numbers. Do you happen to know the W-L percentage of the opponents?
 
Dude was 46th among point guards in Real Plus-Minus last season, was a complete zero on offense, and just had major knee surgery.
 
Dude was 46th among point guards in Real Plus-Minus last season, was a complete zero on offense, and just had major knee surgery.

This. I want the best for the guy, I hope he can really up his game. His defense seems to have been his strong suit. He never drove the ball, got to the line, and was a middling shooter as far as I recall. It remains to be seen what his injury will do to him over the long-term when it comes to durability, but also psychologically, as he was already reluctant to drive.
 
I just cant dismiss the ACL. Theyre all different and we all saw what it did to D-Rose. Im hoping this tear is one of the nicer ones he can bounce back from. Dante relies on his explosion. Hes one of those 100% speed guys a la Westbrook, Rose, Wall. If he were a 70% guy with unreal skill like curry, stockton, and nash i may be less concerned. Although u could say those guys had less margin of error. I dunno, Baron Davis bounced back.

In the spirit of the 'how good will Dante be?' thread, i think Dantes recovery will be a slightly better one than Baron Davis.
 
It's not doubt at all. It's about how to best benefit Exum and the Jazz in the short and long term. He'd gain valuable experience being under some other PGs for a year. He's very young and a defensive stud.

It's not a bad idea at all. But if it doesn't happen the Jazz are instantly upgraded at the point just from having Exum back.

False premise.
 
We understand the ACL tear but he's only 20 yrs old and by all accounts is expected to be 100% and is looking more physically healthy.Dante went straight from Australian high school to the NBA.He never was around the NBA before then was playing in it.Yet with all that lack of experience he excelled on the defensive side of the court and Jazz started winning by defense.

Yet some Jazz fans want him learning behind a more "experienced PG",looking like the 19-10 record with Exum starting is not believable or never happened.Jazz haven't come close to matching the defense or the Wins since.....Making the Question ,Do Wins count.

Because the front office and his team mates stand firmly behind Exum in thinking they do.

Great thread. Been saying these things for a while. It's not like we are winning a chip in the next 3 years, so I see no point in getting some stop gap pg. let the young gun learn from the get go. Let him learn as a leader now and gain the respect of his team.
 
Given his injury and the fact that he will likely not be 100% in his first year back, I like the idea of a good vet presence. However, I also think that with Shelvin Mack, we already have enough there to not go needlessly sign someone else.

My thoughts on next season would be to allow Mack to remain the starter with Dante slowly rounding in to shape with less of the workload overall. That way he can get back fully and when the time is right, take the reigns back over from Mack. If that is at some point next season, great, but otherwise just let him be the backup for the year. He'll still get plenty of time and development under this scenario without stressing his ability to come back 100% immediately.
 
Given his injury and the fact that he will likely not be 100% in his first year back, I like the idea of a good vet presence. However, I also think that with Shelvin Mack, we already have enough there to not go needlessly sign someone else.

My thoughts on next season would be to allow Mack to remain the starter with Dante slowly rounding in to shape with less of the workload overall. That way he can get back fully and when the time is right, take the reigns back over from Mack. If that is at some point next season, great, but otherwise just let him be the backup for the year. He'll still get plenty of time and development under this scenario without stressing his ability to come back 100% immediately.

by the time the next season starts it'll be about 15 months or so since his surgery. You don't think he'll be 100% by then ?
 
by the time the next season starts it'll be about 15 months or so since his surgery. You don't think he'll be 100% by then ?

After a year and a half away from playing NBA basketball? Yeah, I don't think he will be 100% from day 1.

Before his rookie season he spent time away from the floor when he skipped college and he had stamina issues. I suspect he will again when this season starts. I think it will take a few months for him to get back into NBA form.
 
Dude was 46th among point guards in Real Plus-Minus last season, was a complete zero on offense, and just had major knee surgery.

Boom
 
It's not doubt at all. It's about how to best benefit Exum and the Jazz in the short and long term. He'd gain valuable experience being under some other PGs for a year. He's very young and a defensive stud.

It's not a bad idea at all. But if it doesn't happen the Jazz are instantly upgraded at the point just from having Exum back.

False premise.

What PG will sign here for year that would be a GOOD PG for Exum to learn under? That's right...no one.
 
Back
Top