Steve Kerr's Passionate Personal Stand on Gun Control

[RandyForRubio]

Here's a link that explicitly states the San Bernardino shooter making the gun fully automatic

https://www.thetrace.org/2015/12/san-bernardino-shooting-high-capacity-magazine-clips/


Pls proceed to suck a dick

Actually that's not what it said.

It said it had been changed with the intent of making it fully automatic, not that they did make it fully automatic. Pretty important wording there.

In fact, here's a direct quote from the ATF agent: "The Smith & Wesson rifle was changed in an attempt to enable it fire in fully automatic mode, while the DPMS weapon was modified to use a large-capacity magazine, she said."

Also, for someone who bitches about right wing/biased news sources, I'm just shocked you would link to the trace, which is admittedly biased against guns and funded by Michael Bloomberg. Shocked I tell you.

Proceed to suck a fat hairy dick.

 

[Deleted member 848]

Actually that's not what it said.

It said it had been changed with the intent of making it fully automatic, not that they did make it fully automatic. Pretty important wording there.

In fact, here's a direct quote from the ATF agent: "The Smith & Wesson rifle was changed in an attempt to enable it fire in fully automatic mode, while the DPMS weapon was modified to use a large-capacity magazine, she said."

Also, for someone who bitches about right wing/biased news sources, I'm just shocked you would link to the trace, which is admittedly biased against guns and funded by Michael Bloomberg. Shocked I tell you.

Proceed to suck a fat hairy dick.

ATF agents are biased too? Dang, news to me. Also, I'm enjoying watching u grasp at straws. Truly.

 

[RandyForRubio]

What about bump-firing? Doesn't even need mods to fire rapidly

https://www.slate.com/blogs/crime/2...lets_an_ar_15_fire_900_rounds_per_minute.html

Oooooh now we're linking to slate?! I feel like going to breitbart just to make it even.

Yeah, you can shoot really fast with a bump fire. You can't show accurately. And somehow even though it's super easy, nobody has done it yet!!!

 

[jimmy eat jazz]

What a dumb ***.

How so?

 

[RandyForRubio]

ATF agents are biased too? Dang, news to me. Also, I'm enjoying watching u grasp at straws. Truly.

You're kidding, right?

One source says "with the intent to...", the other source says "in an attempt to..."

Neither one said that it actually worked. But hey, you do you.

 

[Miggs]

Actually that's not what it said.

It said it had been changed with the intent of making it fully automatic, not that they did make it fully automatic. Pretty important wording there.

In fact, here's a direct quote from the ATF agent: "The Smith & Wesson rifle was changed in an attempt to enable it fire in fully automatic mode, while the DPMS weapon was modified to use a large-capacity magazine, she said."

Also, for someone who bitches about right wing/biased news sources, I'm just shocked you would link to the trace, which is admittedly biased against guns and funded by Michael Bloomberg. Shocked I tell you.

Proceed to suck a fat hairy dick.

No wonder you're a virgin. Shave that ****.

 

[jimmy eat jazz]

What a dumb ***. Automatic weapons are illegal. If he's basing it off the standards of 1776, women and African Americans still wouldn't be able to vote (or hold office).

It's pretty safe to assume that when people like Kerr refer to automatic weapons, it makes sense to replace rapid, fire large magazine rifles capable of discharging multiple rounds within a short period of time and easily reloadable. You know, the kind of rifles one might take into a target dense environment and shoot/kill multiple people at a rate of hundred+ rounds per minute. Plus, for a few hundred $ one can modify an AR15 to become a fully automatic weapon, and this is perfectly legal.

As for the second part of your reply, you're not even close to understanding the point he was trying to make. I doubt you even tried to understand it.

 

[bigb]

It's pretty safe to assume that when people like Kerr refer to automatic weapons, it makes sense to replace rapid, fire large magazine rifles capable of discharging multiple rounds within a short period of time and easily reloadable. You know, the kind of rifles one might take into a target dense environment and shoot/kill multiple people at a rate of hundred+ rounds per minute. Plus, for a few hundred $ one can modify an AR15 to become a fully automatic weapon, and this is perfectly legal.

As for the second part of your reply, you're not even close to understanding the point he was trying to make. I doubt you even tried to understand it.

Why is that "safe to assume"? Based on the statement, I think it's safe to assume he's not educated enough to speak on the subject.

As for the second part: well, apparently you're the expert on what other people mean, so I'm not going to bother.

 

[jimmy eat jazz]

Why is that "safe to assume"? Based on the statement, I think it's safe to assume he's not educated enough to speak on the subject.

As for the second part: well, apparently you're the expert on what other people mean, so I'm not going to bother.

It's safe to assume based on the context of such statements. If one is only left to interpret meaning by the most literal interpretation available, then communication is rendered almost impossible.

I'm not an expert in what people mean, but at least I do try to understand what they mean, and this includes taking into account context. Honestly, I don't see why this is a hard concept to grasp.

 

[RandyForRubio]

Maybe if you don't have the understanding to figure out the difference between a semi auto and a full auto, you shouldn't be talking about what we need to do with guns. As evidenced in this thread, some people are clueless on the matter.

 

[bigb]

It's safe to assume based on the context of such statements. If one is only left to interpret meaning by the most literal interpretation available, then communication is rendered almost impossible.

I'm not an expert in what people mean, but at least I do try to understand what they mean, and this includes taking into account context. Honestly, I don't see why this is a hard concept to grasp.

Oh, so it's one of those "listen to what I mean, not what I say" scenarios? I've always wondered when I can get away with that. I usually just use it on my 4 year old when I tell him to quit hitting his sister but I really mean "quit being a **** head you devil incarnate". Note I know I can just talk out of my *** whenever I want and claim to be "taken out of context".

 

[fishonjazz]

Maybe if you don't have the understanding to figure out the difference between a semi auto and a full auto, you shouldn't be talking about what we need to do with guns. As evidenced in this thread, some people are clueless on the matter.

I think that if you don't know the ins and outs of all things gun, you can still have an opinion about them and how you think they should be regulated.