green
Well-Known Member
I think Favors best value is at the C position.
Can/Will Lyles make Favors expendable?
- Thread starter The Fresh Prince
- Start date
I think Favors best value is at the C position.
LoPo
Well-Known Member
If Gobert has an okay year, Lyles looks like a future stud, and Favors does well, I wonder if we might let Gobert go to move Favors to C. I doubt it goes down like that, but will be interesting to track.
Sent from my VS980 4G using JazzFanz mobile app
green
Well-Known Member
It's a numbers game, right? If you go big, you'd better score. If you go big on 10 possessions and score on 5, that's 10 points.
If you go small and shoot threes, 3 possessions gets you 9 points.
So, if you go big, you have to score almost 2/10 times more than going small. That's a HUGE number. That is where Favors & Gobert fall short. They aren't good enough offensively to go big.
That's where Gobert is so appealing to Utah. He can't score, but he can defend on the perimeter and at the rim. Most big guys can't do that. Then, if you could pair Lyles with Gobert...then throw in a pick and roll all star like Exum with Hayward draining threes....
You can see where Utah hopes their future goes. Then you fill in with value free agents who can shoot.
Our future rests in Exum's hands.
Going big adds possessions. Gobert and favors should add offensive boards and secure defensive boards over teams going small. It also allows our perimeter players to be more aggressive and close out on shooters and go for steals. Which limits shots through steals, blocks, forced turnovers and shot clock violations. Favors inside game also frees up our perimeter players. We just need our starters to play well and our lineup will beat small ball. Small ball isn't new it's just popular because one team has has a lot if success with it. They are only playing small ball because it takes advantage of their roster/personnel. We can go small for stretches but that isn't our teams strength we need to play to our strength regardless of what other teams do. Big men aren't going away in the NBA. Big guys will always be better rim protectors, rebounders and have the ability to get really high percentage 2s.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using JazzFanz mobile app
Sent from my Nexus 5X using JazzFanz mobile app
karl malone
Well-Known Member
Can he? Yes, his offensive potential is that high & having Gobert beside him would obviously help mask some if his defensive deficiencies.
Will he? The only way I see that happening would be due to financial reasons.
The trio of Lyles, Favors, & Gobert is one of our biggest advantages IMO. Lyles wasn't drafted to replace Favors, he was drafted to be the perfect compliment to the Favors/Gobert frontcourt & provide the type of lineup flexibility that will allow us to counter any type of opposing lineup.
Without a superstar on the roster, defense & lineup versatility needs to be our "star". Favors may eventually be replaced by Lyles in the starting lineup but it would likely be due to finances rather than team preference. Hopefully this isn't the case however & we are able to retain all 3 long-term (although that may not be an option unfortunately).
Will he? The only way I see that happening would be due to financial reasons.
The trio of Lyles, Favors, & Gobert is one of our biggest advantages IMO. Lyles wasn't drafted to replace Favors, he was drafted to be the perfect compliment to the Favors/Gobert frontcourt & provide the type of lineup flexibility that will allow us to counter any type of opposing lineup.
Without a superstar on the roster, defense & lineup versatility needs to be our "star". Favors may eventually be replaced by Lyles in the starting lineup but it would likely be due to finances rather than team preference. Hopefully this isn't the case however & we are able to retain all 3 long-term (although that may not be an option unfortunately).
Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
Perhaps the problem doesn't lie with playing Gobert and Favors together. While I agree the two don't provide optimal spacing, Favs does have a decent midrange game and Gobert poses a threat by rolling to the rim for a high pass and dunk.
Defensively, it's the tandem that makes Utah elite. You can largely negate one of them, but not both when they're on the court together.
Where I think the offense fails is by not complementing those two with 3 other guys who can hit 3's. Gordon is ok, but not great (35%). Hood has been inconsistent and Burks was improving, but has been hurt. So Utah has had PG's who can be left wide open from deep and a plethora of non-shooting wings (Millsap, CJ, etc.).
Let's see what happens when Hill and JJ are added to the mix and teams CANT just sag off the guards and dare them to shoot.
Defensively, it's the tandem that makes Utah elite. You can largely negate one of them, but not both when they're on the court together.
Where I think the offense fails is by not complementing those two with 3 other guys who can hit 3's. Gordon is ok, but not great (35%). Hood has been inconsistent and Burks was improving, but has been hurt. So Utah has had PG's who can be left wide open from deep and a plethora of non-shooting wings (Millsap, CJ, etc.).
Let's see what happens when Hill and JJ are added to the mix and teams CANT just sag off the guards and dare them to shoot.
Last edited:
green
Well-Known Member
The huge flaw in this argument is that Utah was dead last in the NBA in possessions last year. And we've been at the bottom with Snyder as our coach. You'd have to expect that we would stay there.
The teams with the most possessions per game? Sac, GS, Boston, PHX. Run and gun, shoot the three teams.
Look at it this way. If you shoot 45% from two and get 100 shots a game, you score 90 points.
If you shoot 35% from three and get 100 shots per game, you score 105 points per game. That is a HUGE difference.
If you shoot 30% from three, you'd still score 90 points, the same as the two point %.
That means you can miss 15, yes FIFTEEN, more shots and get the same amount of points.
So, the no brainer train of thought is that you want to shoot as many threes as possible. Playing Favors and Gobert together really kills your three point shot opportunities because 40% of your offense can't shoot the three. That's a HUGE disadvantage for the Jazz. Then toss in a PG who can't hit the three? No wonder we sucked.
Or, as you see with GS, a HUGE advantage is you can play 5 players who can hit the three. If you have five players who can hit the three, you are pretty close to unbeatable, which we saw with the Warriors this year.
green
Well-Known Member
Also, this is where rim protection (Lyles) becomes less important. If Lyles sucks at defense and the guy he defends goes 8/15 that is 16 points. BUT, if Lyles can hit 3 threes and then go 6/15, he scores 15 points
OR, if you can get Lyles to go 6/13, suddenly you have the same amount of points as the guy he is guarding but you have opened up two more shots for another, better teammate to shoot the ball.
Then, if you put Gobert behind Lyles to cover for him, and suddenly Lyles' guy goes 6/15, then suddenly Lyles has scored 15 points on 12 shots and his opponent has only scored 12 points on more shots.
You can't get that efficiency from a PF who can't hit the three, say, like Favors.
And we haven't even added in FT's. If Lyles then gets 5 FT's per game, you have a guy with 12 shots scoring 19-20 points a night.
That is erotic. That is the appeal of a Trey Lyles and Gobert playing together.
OR, if you can get Lyles to go 6/13, suddenly you have the same amount of points as the guy he is guarding but you have opened up two more shots for another, better teammate to shoot the ball.
Then, if you put Gobert behind Lyles to cover for him, and suddenly Lyles' guy goes 6/15, then suddenly Lyles has scored 15 points on 12 shots and his opponent has only scored 12 points on more shots.
You can't get that efficiency from a PF who can't hit the three, say, like Favors.
And we haven't even added in FT's. If Lyles then gets 5 FT's per game, you have a guy with 12 shots scoring 19-20 points a night.
That is erotic. That is the appeal of a Trey Lyles and Gobert playing together.
Coach Ellis
Well-Known Member
The article below highlights how the Jazz almost knocked off the undefeated Warriors early last season. Gobert, Favors and Hayward gave them a chance. Swap out Hill for Neto and Exum for Burke, and I think they'd have pulled it off. Blueprint is there - now they need to execute it.
https://m.deseretnews.com/article/865642782/Video-analysis-Why-the-Jazz-nearly-ended-the-Warriors-undefeated-reign.html?pg=all
Neto and Burke combined for 37 minutes for 4 points, 1 rebound and 4 assists. And Burks chipped in for 19 points, 2 rebounds and 2 assists. Jingles and Booker provided 8 points, 4 rebounds and no assists. The depth of the bench is going to cause problems for teams when they're dealing with Hill/Exum, Burks, Iso Joe and Boris Diaw this year.
https://m.deseretnews.com/article/865642782/Video-analysis-Why-the-Jazz-nearly-ended-the-Warriors-undefeated-reign.html?pg=all
Neto and Burke combined for 37 minutes for 4 points, 1 rebound and 4 assists. And Burks chipped in for 19 points, 2 rebounds and 2 assists. Jingles and Booker provided 8 points, 4 rebounds and no assists. The depth of the bench is going to cause problems for teams when they're dealing with Hill/Exum, Burks, Iso Joe and Boris Diaw this year.
Last edited:
I didn't read all of your post I will later. But our team is designed to give us more possessions than our opponent in a game. We are dead last but what is the difference between what we hold opponents too? Obviously teams that run and gun will average more possessions across the season but not against us. Last season also wasn't the best indicator of that due to injuries.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using JazzFanz mobile app