No way Hayward averages less PPG, at least not by anything significant. I would be surprised if he averages less than 20 ppg this year. Highly surprised if it's less than 19.
Think about it. Hayward averaged 19.7 pts a game last year. At the end of games, you take the ball out of Hayward's hands and put it in Hill's. Now you run pick and roll with Hill and Favors. Hayward camps out on the corner three. A quick P&R, a couple swing passes, and instead of a TO Hayward gets a wide open three in the corner.
Now he is averaging 23 pts a game. You do this twice a game and Hayward is averaging 23-25 pts a game.
I think Hayward is a max player and he is our best player and it's not close. I think that now that's he's not playing PG this year, he will appear even better. Just 1-2 plays a game can take him from 19.7 pts to 23-25.
If the Jazz are actually a 55 win team, someone on our team has to be an All-Star. It'd probably he Hayward.
Hayward's usage goes down, his efficiency goes up. How does that affects PPG? I'd guess it goes down a bit.
Hayward's usage goes down, his efficiency goes up. How does that affects PPG? I'd guess it goes down a bit.
You don't take away shots from Hayward so Hood, Hill, Johnson, Burks, etc can shoot it more.
If those players are more efficient, or not defended as well, or are able to get better looks then you do.
Best player does not mean best shooter/scorer/guy you want taking the most shots.Sure, game by game that could happen. But over the course of the season, you'd expect Hayward's shots to go up, not down. It would be dumb to have Hayward's shots go down. He is your best player.