In Sloan's defense, the analytics to break things down (what fraction of missed 3s result in fast break points, etc) didn't exist back then. It was all just kind of done via gut feelings, and looking at more general trends such as "How successful are the teams that shoot a lot of 3s?" By the end of his career that second question was starting to be answered, but for much of his career even that wasn't very clear.
But yeah, what if Sloan had had Stockton and Hornacek and Russell pepper the Bulls with 3s? Oh well.
The issue I have is HOW wrong he was and what it meant. Yeah, the analytics weren't as advanced, but dead last and with those players? Just insane. And if you're that worried about the long bounce, send three guys back as the ball is in the air every time. Furthermore, Sloan was more focused on the importance of spacing than most, so, what the hell?
Anyway. Okay, I'm done.