What's new

Do you support these protests against Trump?

Do you support these protests against Trump?


  • Total voters
    27
From what I have read, MoveOn.org has helped fund and organize quite a few of the protests. The protests are not an organic reaction to the election, they are a political organization with a specific agenda stoking the fires of discontent.
 
From what I have read, MoveOn.org has helped fund and organize quite a few of the protests. The protests are not an organic reaction to the election, they are a political organization with a specific agenda stoking the fires of discontent.

stop

These people really feel the way they claim to feel. You don't have to try to understand it(though you probably should) and you don't have to agree with them. You are robbing yourself of an opportunity to understand the world better by dismissing these people. It's your loss.
 
Rent-a-Mob "Protesters" have born in theProgressive toolbar since Trotsky, maybe since Machiavelli.
Ordinary folks don't carry sledge hammers any more than military ordinance. Sure the point is to mobilize the sentiment but it is not just a spontaneous demonstration, and these are riots not articulate protest.
 
I work in higher education and I still can't quite grasp why people would be mad. Disappointed yes, but not mad.

- In 1995, Bill Clinton said he was going to deport illegal immigrants. It never happened. It never happens.
-Trump was very clear saying he wants to actually do something for inner city blacks instead of just making promises like the blue.
- Trump has issues with Muslim immigrants not Muslim Americans
-What has Trump done to the LGBTQ community?

In my opinion, the protests turning to riots are completely without base.

Sent from my VS980 4G using JazzFanz mobile app
 
if you remove California from the mix then hillary did not win the popular vote. So Trump carried the popular vote in the other 49, in aggregate, while Clinton overwhelmingly carried the biggest single state.

Why would you remove Americans who have a legitimate right to vote? If anything, you should remove dumb rednecks who are the offspring of brothers/sisters, and obviously have birth defects of the brain. I think we all know how it would have gone then.
 
Why would you remove Americans who have a legitimate right to vote? If anything, you should remove dumb rednecks who are the offspring of brothers/sisters, and obviously have birth defects of the brain. I think we all know how it would have gone then.

This train of thought always cracks me up. Only idiots and "deplorables" vote for the candidate I am against. Only people that are smart and well reasoned vote for the candidate I support.

What's funny is that millions of voters that voted for Pres Obama changed sides and voted for Trump. So they were smart and well reasoned in 08 and 12 and somehow got dumb by 16?
 
This train of thought always cracks me up. Only idiots and "deplorables" vote for the candidate I am against. Only people that are smart and well reasoned vote for the candidate I support.

What's funny is that millions of voters that voted for Pres Obama changed sides and voted for Trump. So they were smart and well reasoned in 08 and 12 and somehow got dumb by 16?

Still though, why were you wanting remove california from the voting again?
 
Why would you remove Americans who have a legitimate right to vote? If anything, you should remove dumb rednecks who are the offspring of brothers/sisters, and obviously have birth defects of the brain. I think we all know how it would have gone then.

Yeah I am sure if you removed all 300 of them it would have made a HUGE difference. Unless you are implying that my father is one of those just because he voted for Trump in which case you ARE the problem, and **** you for good measure.
 
Back
Top