We already have Hood and Burks... we needed frontcourt depth.Actually Lyles could be considered a mistake since Booker was picked directly after him.
We already have Hood and Burks... we needed frontcourt depth.Actually Lyles could be considered a mistake since Booker was picked directly after him.
Well you also have to look at what they got right as well.. Gobert.. Hood.. Lyles..
Boo... So they're gonna let Millsap and Favors walk without getting jack **** in return? Sounds wasteful to me.
How could you not conclude they've squandered the return from the Deron trade?
Decisions have to be made in the moment, without benefit of hindsight. Teams are going to get some of them wrong. Especially with second round guys like Clarkson and Powell. Now I guess we're assuming Hill is a priority based on a Marc Stein blurb?and how else is the FO to be judged? in foresight?
You know that Favors has another season under contract right? We are not letting him walk for nothing because we are not renegotiating him this season. This gives us more options and wiggle room.
Hood and Exum need to be extended that same summer, they'll already be at the cap after this summer.. somethings gotta give, and trading him for an expiring and a draft pick could work but it's still not a good return on a player that just turned 27 and is arguably a top-10 pf..
and how else is the FO to be judged? in foresight?
We can make room just fine if Favors is healthy and playing.
This team has also gone over the cap if we are competitive which we can do to resign our own guys.
The mechanics of favors extension would have made it impossible to retain Hill. Say we retain Hill and Favors gets right and starts killing it again. We can then move Hill and Dante is now hopefully ready.
If favs doesn't get right this year or next he won't get the 20 M or so we think he will.
What if we traded favors at draft time or the off season? We wouldn't be getting nothing for him.
I just think it is funny how some folks don't see this and run back the same dumbass arguments they did before.
Also we got Rodney hood and a 2017 first for letting millsap walk and using that space to take on dead money. No one was going to give up much for half a season of Paul at the trade deadline.
If we extend one person it should be Hill. And it isn't choosing between them.
I guess contractually it may make sense. With Exum still being raw and Burks being MIA it does make sense to try and keep both-- but gun to my head (and with knowledge of Favors being able to be healthy in the long term) i'm choosing to stick with derrick over George. That's kinda all I'm saying. Good points HH