What's new

Gordon Hayward

No. Hayward is a very good player but he is not a killer. Not like a Melo.
You don't game plan against Melo, he takes an NCAA championship away from you.
You don't game plan against Melo, he takes an Olympic gold medal away from you.
You don't game plan against Hayward....uhh, Golden State still wins in four.

You should leave this forum and go write Melo slash fiction full time.
 
No. Hayward is a very good player but he is not a killer. Not like a Melo.
You don't game plan against Melo, he takes an NCAA championship away from you.
You don't game plan against Melo, he takes an Olympic gold medal away from you.
You don't game plan against Hayward....uhh, Golden State still wins in four.

Seems like I remember someone saying if New York didn't make it to the finals they'd get banned a few years back...

Sound familiar?
 
No. Hayward is a very good player but he is not a killer. Not like a Melo.
You don't game plan against Melo, he takes an NCAA championship away from you.
You don't game plan against Melo, he takes an Olympic gold medal away from you.
You don't game plan against Hayward....uhh, Golden State still wins in four.

You don't game plan against Melo...until he ends up in China after the Knicks kick him out of NY.
 
No. Hayward is a very good player but he is not a killer. Not like a Melo.
You don't game plan against Melo, he takes an NCAA championship away from you.
You don't game plan against Melo, he takes an Olympic gold medal away from you.
You don't game plan against Hayward....uhh, Golden State still wins in four.
FTFY
 
The best thing Hayward did was when he wasn't taking Chris Paul's ******** in Game 5. That's a long way from the guy who didn't do anything when Delonte West gave him a wet willy or allowed JJ Barea to try his bush league psyche out stuff by bumping him off the free throw line. Nobody ****s with the G-sus now!
 
No. Hayward is a very good player but he is not a killer. Not like a Melo.
You don't game plan against Melo, he takes an NCAA championship away from you.
You don't game plan against Melo, he takes an Olympic gold medal away from you.
You don't game plan against Hayward....uhh, Golden State still wins in four.

You don't gameplan against Melo, because he's not in the playoffs. Again.
 
No. Hayward is a very good player but he is not a killer. Not like a Melo.
You don't game plan against Melo, he takes an NCAA championship away from you.
You don't game plan against Melo, he takes an Olympic gold medal away from you.
You don't game plan against Hayward....uhh, Golden State still wins in four.

Killer in 31 out of 82 games. Awesome. Thanks for the ongoing comic relief. Fun to laugh at you with your knickerbockers down. Phil wins everywhere but NY. Can't pull the dismal franchise out of the bottom.

Knicks would manage to lose a best of 7 game series against the Warriors in 2.
 
Yeah, and we should go after Lance Stephenson and let Hayward walk.

And -- just last year -- that Hayward = Hood.

I still think Hood has the potential to be Hayward light. He needs to learn to finish in traffic, and get fully healthy so he can improve his shooting. But Hayward had room to improve too, and he did. A combo of Hayward/Hood long term might be just the thing.
 
Hayward gets MAD props for this series! But the best part is that it was a team effort all round. Everyone deserves credit. Even Dante came in and gave us valuable minutes when he got a chance. Neto, Favors showed up big the last game, etc.

But here's the biggest difference. EVERYONE had a bad game. EVERYONE that is except Gordon. He was super efficient. George Hill averaged less than 1 turnover per game, but without looking at the stats, I saw around 3 or 4 turnovers per game against the clippers. Gobert was a no show in game 7 due to terrible reffing. If Hood had come to play more, we would have won the series earlier. Neto did the best he could... but it wasn't good enough for long stretches. Joe Johnson turned into a chucker at times in the games we lost in particular. When he was off, we lost.

But I saw two players who were solid all series. Gordon and J'ingles. Even when Joe missed a few threes, his defense was on. I don't remember seeing Joe Ingles missing 3s AND playing poor defense for more than a 3 minute stretch. He was GREAT to watch chasing down Reddick. JJ was frustrated and held around 10 points below his season average on all games except one! Mad props to G.Hawg and J'ing.
 
One more thing... most of the 'closers' in the league are HIGH VOLUME mediocre efficiency players. Remember that Kobe beat us with 61(?) points on 60 shots last year. It was terrible efficiency. Westbrook went something like 51 points on 45 shots and was bragging to Beverly that 'No one can guard me'. Efficiency isn't a part of that mentality. Those guys do hit buzzer beaters. I don't think Hayward is that player. He plays within the system. That's why Joe Johnson was so huge. Joe could ease that scoring burden for G Hawg a bit coming down the stretch and Gordon was an amazing second option. We need Hood, a draft pick, or other free agents to keep aiding in this process while Gordon becomes that volume guy or closer. He is no pro closer. He is a solid closer. But again, some of ya'll would LOVE to have Westbrook on the team just because he individually closes games vs. a whole team of depth and options that win games together. As for me and my house... we prefer team ball.

Again, mad props to G. Hawg and Jing!
 
Back
Top