Favors agent says only way he stays long-term is if Hayward leaves

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Would Denver say no to a trade of Favors for Arthur and Barton? No idea what kind of value Favs has, but I'd love to get one or both of those guys. Both are basically expiring and both are buried on the depth chart... or Barton should be if they ever plan to play Beasley.

I don't see the point in trading Favors for other expiring contracts unless we get a draft pick.


Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[stitches]

Would Denver say no to a trade of Favors for Arthur and Barton? No idea what kind of value Favs has, but I'd love to get one or both of those guys. Both are basically expiring and both are buried on the depth chart... or Barton should be if they ever plan to play Beasley.

Why would we do it if they are expiring? I like Favors better than both. Especially if he's healthy. As Cy said, it only makes sense if we are getting future assets in addition.

 

[Handlogten's Heros]

I don't see the point in trading Favors for other expiring contracts unless we get a draft pick.


Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app

Getting two high quality rotation players that may fit better. If we trade AB and dump his salary we may need some depth on the wing. If JJ plays more 4 than three because Lyles sucks I think it helps too. I honestly think they'd say no but Favs is tough to peg.

Favs is extension eligible and Denver may end up with excess cap space too... might have more value to them than us that way:

 

[Handlogten's Heros]

Why would we do it if they are expiring? I like Favors better than both. Especially if he's healthy. As Cy said, it only makes sense if we are getting future assets in addition.

The if healthy is a big if based on the last two years. I like the way Arthur fits... good shooter smart defender... can play four or five in spots.

 

[stitches]

Getting two high quality rotation players that may fit better. If we trade AB and dump his salary we may need some depth on the wing. If JJ plays more 4 than three because Lyles sucks I think it helps too. I honestly think they'd say no but Favs is tough to peg.

Favs is extension eligible and Denver may end up with excess cap space too... might have more value to them than us that way:

That's why you ask for something of value, not expiring contracts.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Getting two high quality rotation players that may fit better. If we trade AB and dump his salary we may need some depth on the wing. If JJ plays more 4 than three because Lyles sucks I think it helps too. I honestly think they'd say no but Favs is tough to peg.

Favs is extension eligible and Denver may end up with excess cap space too... might have more value to them than us that way:

Barton isnt a fit at all and Arthur has his own injury concerns, and none are better than Favors. The trade makes no sense IMO. Unless there is a draft pick, it's a no.

 

[Handlogten's Heros]

That's why you ask for something of value, not expiring contracts.

I understand the thought there but we are trading expiring contracts too... I mean if we can get a replacement player and a draft pick great but I don't see that happening.

You are higher on favors than me and most of the board (I think). I'd wait until after Hayward re-signs to do something, but either favors gets healthy and is too expensive for us next year or he has another terrible year and can't get through the injuries. If Hayward leaves we have the space to make it work.

 

[Handlogten's Heros]

Barton isnt a fit at all and Arthur has his own injury concerns, and none are better than Favors. The trade makes no sense IMO. Unless there is a draft pick, it's a no.

Barton is a good shooter... if AB is gone and Hood gets hurt Barton fills in nicely. Exum needs to play PG and honestly if we had Barton and Hayward re-signed I might kick the tires on what Hood could get in a trade.

 

[stitches]

I understand the thought there but we are trading expiring contracts too... I mean if we can get a replacement player and a draft pick great but I don't see that happening.

You are higher on favors than me and most of the board (I think). I'd wait until after Hayward re-signs to do something, but either favors gets healthy and is too expensive for us next year or he has another terrible year and can't get through the injuries. If Hayward leaves we have the space to make it work.

I'd always get the draft picks before I get the 8th and 9th man expiring rotational players. You can get those for free. Favors should net you a good return... or if he can't he's more valuable to us for this year than those players.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

I'd always get the draft picks before I get the 8th and 9th man expiring rotational players. You can get those for free. Favors should net you a good return... or if he can't he's more valuable to us for this year than those players.

If that offer is the best the Jazz could do, I'd rather them just keep Favors and throw the dice he ups his trade value during the season. That trade would be horrendous for the Jazz. Arthur/Barton arent doing more than Favors next season for teh Jazz and they dont bring any future value.

 

[Quin's Murderface]

I am hoping that the cavs win it all again so that we can trade favors and other to the cavs for Love.

I wonder if they lose badly if they don't consider getting rid of Love as well? Love would be a great pickup, obviously. I just doubt the Jazz have the assets.

 

[Park Bites]

I wonder if they lose badly if they don't consider getting rid of Love as well? Love would be a great pickup, obviously. I just doubt the Jazz have the assets.

He has 2 more years with a player option for a 3rd. He is making 22+ million.

I was wondering is a deal like hood, Lyles and favors? Others they might be interested in are Burks or Neto.

I could see a trade going like love and shumpert for hood, favors, Lyles and burks.

Cleveland needs to fill out it's roster

Sent from my Z981 using JazzFanz mobile app