Zach Lowe: Paul George would love to play with Gordon Hayward

[Shad]

Wait, people on here are willing to trade favors/hood/picks for a 1 year rental on PG? LOL

 

[orangello]

I have been the biggest "Love to Utah" guy around here.

But if can get PG over Love and say no? Lol.

In today's NBA, you want a Gobert, a PG and three 6ft7 to 6ft9 guys who can hit threes and defend.

PG is perfect in Utah. We'd be the second best team in the NBA, hands down.

Get PG and make him your #1 and All NBA player and win 60 games. Then, make him walk away from a shot at a title, more money and 90 mins from LA.

I'd bet he wouldn't leave.

You HAVE to take that bet.

This. So much this.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

This. So much this.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

So you'd take one year of Paul George over 3 years of Kevin Love?

 

[orangello]

So you'd take one year of Paul George over 3 years of Kevin Love?

Yes, everyday and twice on Sunday.

Go all in for a year and pray for a little luck.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

 

[stitches]

I think I would rather have Love than PG. The security of 3 years is just preferable to me than swinging for the fences in a single year. I think the most likely scenario is the Jazz lose to the GSW in 6 in the conference finals then PG leaves. Hayward most likely just signed a 1+1 knowing of PG's desire to join the Lakers. Upon George leaving Hayward is faced with the harsh reality the Jazz lost to the GSW even with Paul George, now that George has left the situation in Utah seems bleak.

It's not 3 years. It's 2.

 

[8]

So you'd take one year of Paul George over 3 years of Kevin Love?

Yeah

 

[David Stern]

The thing is that the Jazz have to find a way to get another star. It's going to take risk, but this is the type of move that the franchise has to make in order to contend. We simply can't pay everyone, so we HAVE to swing for the fences with a deal like this.

 

[orangello]

It's not 3 years. It's 2.

So only one extra year of a one way player vs a two way superstar?

Yea, give me PG for a year.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

It's not 3 years. It's 2.

http://www.spotrac.com/nba/cleveland-cavaliers/kevin-love-6132/

It's 3

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

So only one extra year of a one way player vs a two way superstar?

Yea, give me PG for a year.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Stitches is wrong.

 

[stitches]

http://www.spotrac.com/nba/cleveland-cavaliers/kevin-love-6132/

It's 3

The third is a player option. Basketball insiders has the best and most accurate information on contracts. Others are missing player options, team options etc.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/cleveland-cavaliers-team-salary/

 

[orangello]

Stitches is wrong.

And my answer is still the same. PG for a year over Love for 3.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

 

[Bodhi]

The thing is that the Jazz have to find a way to get another star. It's going to take risk, but this is the type of move that the franchise has to make in order to contend. We simply can't pay everyone, so we HAVE to swing for the fences with a deal like this.

Honestly, I think I'm on this mindset as well. Though I don't think it should or would take Favors, Hood and MULTIPLE firsts. Is that what people are saying? I skipped to the end.

 

[stitches]

And my answer is still the same. PG for a year over Love for 3.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

The third year is a player option. For all intents and purposes his contract is 2 years.

 

[Bodhi]

The other option is just trade a few pieces and get Donovan Mitchell and, bam, 3rd superstar. I guess PG is a decent 2nd choice.

 

[green]

With Gobert, Hayward and George, Utah can have an outside shot at GS.

With Gobert, Hayward and Love, Utah is really good but would have the same result as this year, i.e. getting swept by GS every year.

PG gives Utah a shot at pushing GS.

Give me a shot at greatness.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

The third year is a player option. For all intents and purposes his contract is 2 years.

You have a crystal ball?

 

[orangello]

With Gobert, Hayward and George, Utah can have an outside shot at GS.

With Gobert, Hayward and Love, Utah is really good but would have the same result as this year, i.e. getting swept by GS every year.

PG gives Utah a shot at pushing GS.

Give me a shot at greatness.

I see it the same way. With Love we'd be fighting with SA/Hou/GS for the next 2 (or 3) years. Ultimately I feel like SA and certainly GS will be better than us.

With PG then only GS is better. We're the second best team in the West and probably NBA. I'd like that even if it was only for a year.

Again, hopefully lady luck smiles over the Jazz in that PG scenario.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

 

[orangello]

Honestly, I think I'm on this mindset as well. Though I don't think it should or would take Favors, Hood and MULTIPLE firsts. Is that what people are saying? I skipped to the end.

Indy is asking for a starter and two firsts.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

I see it the same way. With Love we'd be fighting with SA/Hou/GS for the next 2 (or 3) years. Ultimately I feel like SA and certainly GS will be better than us.

With PG then only GS is better. We're the second best team in the West and probably NBA. I'd like that even if it was only for a year.

Again, hopefully lady luck smiles over the Jazz in that PG scenario.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

You'd like it for taht year, but then would be pissed when Hayward and George leave the next year and the Jazz blew future picks to get George.