What's new
By:

NBA Free Agency Moves in General (related to the Jazz, but not just moves made by the Jazz)

Damn, I think we could have taken on that DeMarre deal. He would have been useful this season and we could use the draft assets.
 
infection said:
Damn, I think we could have taken on that DeMarre deal. He would have been useful this season and we could use the draft assets.
Click to expand...

No way. Then you are paying Carroll/Burks a combined 27 million for the 18/19 season.

A late first round pick isnt worth it for a team like the Jazz who need to re-sign two key players in that off-season.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
No way. Then you are paying Carroll/Burks a combined 27 million for the 18/19 season.

A late first round pick isnt worth it for a team like the Jazz who need to re-sign two key players in that off-season.
Click to expand...

Come on, a couple weeks ago you were talking about trading Favors for DeMarre and a first. DeMarre would put us at like 74 million next summer, and there aren't even many good free agents who aren't restricted.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
No way. Then you are paying Carroll/Burks a combined 27 million for the 18/19 season.

A late first round pick isnt worth it for a team like the Jazz who need to re-sign two key players in that off-season.
Click to expand...

They'd be worth it if they counted as one player.
 
infection said:
Come on, a couple weeks ago you were talking about trading Favors for DeMarre and a first. DeMarre would put us at like 74 million next summer, and there aren't even many good free agents who aren't restricted.
Click to expand...

That was when I thought we had Hayward coming back and re-signing Hood wasn't a priority.
 
infection said:
Damn, I think we could have taken on that DeMarre deal. He would have been useful this season and we could use the draft assets.
Click to expand...
**** demarre
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top