Charlottesville

[♪alt13]

Your analogy makes 0 sense as I didn't call anything "fascist", I just said they share a certain tactic of fascist. Repressing speech is a tactic of fascist regimes.

Dutch said "Antifa are fascist"
I said "Uh, no thems potatoes."
You said "They kinda are fascist"

That makes sense because fascists are known for suppressing hate speach.

hint:fascists are known for the opposite of that.

I have already made the relevant argument to this latest post of yours.

For fascists these are not tactics they are the goal.

 

[♪alt13]

[TWEET]898181957418455041[/TWEET]
https://mobile.twitter.com/RepCohen/status/898181957418455041?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fd-26522928321549172708.ampproject.net%2F1502819823157%2Fframe.html

 

[Tak]

How have your messages been anything short of sympathetic or enabling for a hate group? The "ANTIFA" you seem to be referring to is a bastardized American thing, and an extreme, extermist minority of the left. You appear to believe that they're the only people counter protesting, and stand on that platform as can be seen from the response to Stroked's post here:

When facing the likes of the Klan, and other various demonstrably hate oriented militant groups, of course people are gonna fall behind a militant shield. But they're not the leaders, they're not the heart of the message. I can't say the same for the Unite the Right movement.

I started to talk about ANTIFA because people started to talk wonders about them. Did anywhere I say they are the only ones counter protesting? No. Did anywhere I say something against the other organizations counter protesting? No. Did anywhere I say any organization, including ANTIFA, haven't the right to counter protest? No. See how you build something in your head just to find the enemy in me? How often you do the same with others?

In the other hand, you acknowledge that ANTIFA is an "extremist minority of the left", but you have no problems associating with them because "they're not the leaders, they're not the heart of the message". Isn't that the same thing that was criticized about the alt-right and their relations with extremist right wing groups? Why something that was obviously bad for a group now is a good thing for another? Or do you think there's a "good" extremism and a "bad" extremism?

 

[Cappy_Smurf]

Who other than the obvious trolls have said this?

Sorry, wasn't referring to posts on this board, as I haven't even bothered to read much in this thread.

Mostly referring to my friends and relatives on FB. I can somewhat understand people voting for Trump because they hated Hillary, but I'll never understand these people who rush in to defend and make light of such things as bragging about committing sexual assault and sticking up for Nazis as good people. Yet, that's exactly what so many people are doing.

Some of the crap I've seen on FB is so ****ing stupid, it makes me wonder how these people dress themselves. During his campaign, Trump said something about how even if he was caught on video murdering someone, his supporters would still stand by him. At this point, it seems obvious that wasn't an exaggeration in the least.

 

[Harambe]

I started to talk about ANTIFA because people started to talk wonders about them. Did anywhere I say they are the only ones counter protesting? No. Did anywhere I say something against the other organizations counter protesting? No. Did anywhere I say any organization, including ANTIFA, haven't the right to counter protest? No. See how you build something in your head just to find the enemy in me? How often you do the same with others?

In the other hand, you acknowledge that ANTIFA is an "extremist minority of the left", but you have no problems associating with them because "they're not the leaders, they're not the heart of the message". Isn't that the same thing that was criticized about the alt-right and their relations with extremist right wing groups? Why something that was obviously bad for a group now is a good thing for another? Or do you think there's a "good" extremism and a "bad" extremism?

No, and the reason why is because of the message. ANTIFA, in this situation, is coming under the message of a group not born of hate. I can't say the same for the opposite side.

 

[Siro]

The nationalist right is saying that the Nazi was attacked first and he was trying to get away to save himself.

/grabs popcorn

 

[Harambe]

The nationalist right is saying that the Nazi was attacked first and he was trying to get away to save himself.

/grabs popcorn

Yeah, they also said it was an Anti-Trump, Anti-Fascist guy that murdered people. So... *shrug*

 

[Boris]

No, and the reason why is because of the message. ANTIFA, in this situation, is coming under the message of a group not born of hate. I can't say the same for the opposite side.

Wrong. They are hater haters that is there mission statement duh. An I am a antifa hater so I am an hater hater hater.

 

[Siro]

Yeah, they also said it was an Anti-Trump, Anti-Fascist guy that murdered people. So... *shrug*

I saw video proof of their claim.


[video]https://media.8ch.net/file_store/404c37b6d9a5dc28172fac8cad191d70ea7a23ef8625ba4e5b04243903f72d39.webm


Clearly struck with a plastic bag, unprovoked!

 

[Tak]

No, and the reason why is because of the message. ANTIFA, in this situation, is coming under the message of a group not born of hate. I can't say the same for the opposite side.

Wait, they are OK because they are "not the heart of the message" but aren't the same as the other "because of the message"? Do you even know the message? Or are you just throwing words away because you don't want to admit you feel comfortable associating yourself with an extremist organization? Again, are they the "good" extremists?

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Dutch said "Antifa are fascist"
I said "Uh, no thems potatoes."
You said "They kinda are fascist"

That makes sense because fascists are known for suppressing hate speach.

hint:fascists are known for the opposite of that.

I have already made the relevant argument to this latest post of yours.

For fascists these are not tactics they are the goal.

Then quote dutch, not me. I dont read that guy's post.

 

[Boris]

I understand how you;re trying to process this within the law. Good on you, but I find it cowardly. Sorry to offend, I know I am, but I have to. My conscience does not allow for even the tiniest acceptance of this type of speech, after all we've been through. I will not tolerate it, I will not allow it to victimize me or anyone else, and I will fight (non-violently) those who try to carve out any piece of society for these mongrels.

Okay I have been thinking. Boris does this from time to time.


Why do liberals need to restrict freedom so much? You are afraid of guns ban guns. You are afraid white supremacist ban free speech. Why you are so worried by dumb *** white supremacist when the world laughs at those dip ****s? There won't be more Nazis tomorrow they a dyin breed. Tell em that an laugh in there face no reason to politicize it an piss off a bunch of good people. That ain't helpin nuthin.