What's new

Kawhi Leonard is moving up on the Big Board!!

LAS VEGAS -- They say that what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas.

BY ESPN's Chad Ford

Well, I'm about to spill a few draft secrets from Sin City.



I spent the last two days with trainer Joe Abunassar, of Impact Basketball in Vegas, looking at a number of first-round prospects.

Abunassar has a great track record with clients like Kevin Garnett, Chauncey Billups, Danny Granger, Rudy Gay and many others. Once again this year he has a whopping 20-plus prospects in his gym preparing for the draft.



Here are five things I learned:




1. Kawhi Leonard is a big-time prospect



The San Diego State forward remains a bit of an enigma to NBA scouts. He ranked as just the 56th-best high school prospect in the class of 2009 by ESPNU and didn't really come on until his senior year in high school.



As a freshman he drew raves for his athletic ability, motor and rebounding, but scouts struggled to see exactly how he fit at the next level. Last season he helped lead the Aztecs to one of the best records in college basketball and drew serious attention from scouts. But after the season, the NBA was still largely split on what his pro potential was.



While we had Leonard in the top 14 of our Big Board most of the year, a number of NBA executives were much more pessimistic about his future. They pointed to his "tweener" status and subpar perimeter shooting as concerns. A few weeks ago, one GM told me he thought Leonard was, at best, a role player at the next level.



I respectfully disagree, as do a handful of NBA execs and scouts. I was blown away by Leonard at the workouts. Not only is his physical profile impressive (huge hands, long wing span, NBA body), but also he's much more skilled than your typical high-energy forward.

Leonard has been working on his jump shot since the season ended and was stroking it from NBA 3-point range the two days I was in the gym. And he demonstrated excellent ball-handling skills for a player his size -- both are prerequisites for an NBA small forward. He also has the ability to guard the 2, 3 and 4 at the next level.



Leonard proved to be a real gym rat as well. He was the first guy in the gym and the last one to leave both days I was there. On Tuesday I arrived at 9 a.m. and left at 5:30 -- Leonard was there the whole time working on various things; he must have shot 1,000 jumpers.



I've been trying to find a good NBA comp for him all year, and I think the best may be the Blazers' Gerald Wallace. Leonard has the same type of motor and toughness and is more skilled than you think. If he keeps shooting the ball like he did Tuesday and Wednesday, I believe he could end up being a top-5 pick in the draft. We've moved him up to No. 5 on our Big Board after seeing what he brings to the table.



He may not be a superstar at the next level, but it's hard to figure how he misses as a 10-year NBA player with that work ethic, physical profile and motor
 
At 12 maybe. At 6 no way.

If he is the best SF in the draft, and he has indeed made large bounds in his stroke, I dont see why he isnt a possibility at 6. Right now it's pretty much a crap shoot besides Irving and Williams, everyone else is pretty much neck and neck.
 
He seems like the perfect compliment at SF to Hayward. He can physically guard anyone but ultra quick PG's and (big) big men man up and he is an excellent slasher.
 
Hell, then we draft Jimmer. Our starting line could be almost completely made of Mid-Major and small school players.
 
He seems like the perfect compliment at SF to Hayward. He can physically guard anyone but ultra quick PG's and (big) big men man up and he is an excellent slasher.

Agreed and sounds like he could be the answer at sf with Hayward at the 2. If hes really like G. Wallace with a better shot, I'd call that a win and gambe with Jimmer with the 12th pick
 
If the guy can develop a legit shot I like him but not many players develop a shot in the NBA who didn't shoot well in college. To big of risk for me at #6. At 12, absolutely.
 
If the guy can develop a legit shot I like him but not many players develop a shot in the NBA who didn't shoot well in college. To big of risk for me at #6. At 12, absolutely.

I will go ahead and disagree with that statement. There are a ton of players who have greatly improved their stroke coming out of college. Dwayne Wade is just one of the many examples. Our very own Millsap.
 
this **** darft gets more exciting if you think about improving defensively. Biyombo, Leonard, and Singleton have the tools to be legit NBA defenders (none more so than Bismack). Maybe we get an offensive beast with next year's pick(s)?

(BTW, the only player mentioned here that I'd take at 6 is Biyombo.)
 
I will go ahead and disagree with that statement. There are a ton of players who have greatly improved their stroke coming out of college. Dwayne Wade is just one of the many examples.

The process usually takes years, not 2 months. If I'm drafting Leonard, it's going to be on the assumption he'll never shoot the ball much better than he already has 168 times in games in the Mountain Conference. I'll be drafting him based on what he can be if never learns to shoot. Which means I'm not drafting him at 6.
 
The process usually takes years, not 2 months. If I'm drafting Leonard, it's going to be on the assumption he'll never shoot the ball much better than he already has 168 times in games in the Mountain Conference. I'll be drafting him based on what he can be if never learns to shoot. Which means I'm not drafting him at 6.

Way to express my same sentiments. I only saw him play twice (against BYU both times), but neither time impressed me much. At least if I recall correctly he didn't have much of an impact on the games at all. I'm willing to suppose that maybe I caught him on off games... but a #6 pick should have been a heck of a player in COLLEGE BALL, not just in WORKOUTS.
 
Back
Top