What's new

Donald Fires FBI Director who's investigating Russian Election Hacking

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
If Donald had been caught on tape leaning over to Putin and saying, "I'll have more flexibility after the election," it would be a biggger lightning rod and a bigger legitimate piece of evidence of collusion than any of these things you have pointed out, by far.

No, it wouldn't. It's like you don't understand what evidence means. It would probably sway public opinion more, but that's not what really matters here.
 
But let's play...

What was Obama's comment "evidence" of? And I mean like the stuff a judge allows a jury to consider in a trial. What EXACTLY does the comment indicate?
 
Media outlets reporting that Flynn and his son will soon be indicted. Probably Monday morning.

Another “nothing Burger” right repubs?
 
Media outlets reporting that Flynn and his son will soon be indicted. Probably Monday morning.

Another “nothing Burger” right repubs?
As usual, don't lump all Republicans into the category of Trump supporters. His approval is like 37% so there are plenty of us who don't like him.
 
For what it's worth, I wouldn't trust the businessinsider.com website. They are very anti-Trump, which is fine with me, but they take it to the extreme where they often talk about extremely small probability events as if they are very possible or even likely to occur. (I haven't read this particular article, just a general comment.)

Good to know. But the only opinion expressed was my own; that it was going nowhere.

For the record, businessinsider isn't the only group reporting it.

The Hill

and congressman's gaetz site

And who can forget the original Faux in the henhouse
 
If Donald had been caught on tape leaning over to Putin and saying, "I'll have more flexibility after the election," it would be a biggger lightning rod and a bigger legitimate piece of evidence of collusion than any of these things you have pointed out, by far.

Have you considered the difference? One would have been, at the time, becoming president, whereas the other would be going off duty?

Have you considered that, all things being equal, the statement is factually true? That a president getting out of office would have a little more flexibility coming out of office.
 
I don't think you'll find a better examination of Russian interference in America's 2016 election then the two part Frontline documentary that was broadcast on 10/25 and 11/1. Examines Putin's career beginning in the 1990's. The link here is set to Part 2 because it focuses on the election, and it can be viewed independent of Part 1.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/putins-revenge/#video-2

FRONTLINE tells the inside story of how Vladimir Putin came to see the United States as an enemy — and why he decided to target an American election.
 
Paradise papers look interesting. They seem to indicate that a Kushner associate invested in Facebook and Twitter with Kremlin money.
 
Lessee......

a notorious acolyte of Obama lies to Pence, and Trump fires him. Gallant first effort at being inclusive in the new administration, and it goes to hell before Trump can even get the keys to the office.

yes, I do see how this charade is boiling down to nothing.

But, hey, chumps..... the stakes are high, very high. WWIII hangs in the balance. Gotta double down on your stupid wild charges.

Got it.
 
Lessee......

a notorious acolyte of Obama lies to Pence, and Trump fires him. Gallant first effort at being inclusive in the new administration, and it goes to hell before Trump can even get the keys to the office.

yes, I do see how this charade is boiling down to nothing.

But, hey, chumps..... the stakes are high, very high. WWIII hangs in the balance. Gotta double down on your stupid wild charges.

Got it.

Nothing?

This is a by the book, paint by numbers take down of an international fiscal giant.

And I don't buy that you think there's nothing.
 
Back
Top