Amateur.
Destruction of a Nation 101
- Thread starter ♪alt13
- Start date
Amateur.
I'll sort of disagree, you can show a bluff in a certain situation, or fold a strong hand that maybe you shouldn't have, so that your opponent might overplay in a similar situation later when the stakes are higher.
Most people don't play cash games so they don't use playing slow and tight to set up fast and loose bluffs plus getting lucky on flops that nobody would put you on so you can take a huge pot.
Playing the ringer, losing small pots you know you shouldn't call so people will start pushing you with bigger bets.
Plenty of strategies that take a while to set up.
Playing the ringer, losing small pots you know you shouldn't call so people will start pushing you with bigger bets.
Plenty of strategies that take a while to set up.
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
Trump probably cant even spell poker. Probably spells it poke her.
The voice in my head reads this with a lisp.
If you think Trump is deploying this amazing strategy above, then I'll say it again. You don't know how to play poker.
Trump is ****ing stupid. Master manipulator, conman, and liar. But ****ing stupid.
Rabbid Trump hate brain turnoff noted.
If you don't think Trump ith thinking 15 thteps ahead or that trade imbalances can go on forever then your lithp thayth everything.
I didn't say it is amazing or endorse anything; only telling what his game plan likely is.
Welcome back franklin.
I didn't think franklin was anybody's uncle, and if he comes back he won't be playing poker.
anyways, Trump is a player, whatever game he's in. He will shake up the deal to get others off balance and willing to deal.
The Chinese can play his game, though. And as long as they keep the long view in focus, they are not going to put it all on the table. They know four or eight years is short range, sorta like accountant's quarterlies in a five year plan.
My money's on something along the lines of "all news stations send must show talking points. What's the difference? at what percentage of word for word would make a difference", and then lead in to "where's the connection to trump exactly? just because he likes something doesn't mean he's behind it. Journalistic Integrity isn't a thing. They're not hostages, they could quit. I bet the FBI's shadow government set this up in the first place to distract from the guy that was on his way to proving the earth was flat"
Eventually he'd just lead into "I know better than doctoral candidates and 30+ year career reporters anyway. This is a non issue"
So now that I got the fake answers he doesn't really believe out of the way for him, I'm a little curious what his stance is, too.
Right wing types put out a video much like this that demonstrated left wing bias a year or so ago.
My response is that individual stations create very little of their own content. Reuters, and the Associated Press produce a lot of the stories that local television stations report. The TV personalities are typically just reading it word for word. So Sinclaire is attempting to fill that role for their stations by pushing stories that they support. I don't see it as any more or less sinister than what already exists.