This is the MAN we need at #3 - C Jonas Valanciunas

[Hantlers]

Actually, no I didn't. Liar. Someone else posted the numbers.


Besides that, I didn't necessarily mean weak as in not strong. I meant weak as in an awkward, non-authoritative post game. Sorry for confusing you.

And I have posted a video at some point. And haven't you heard of Youtube?

Jimmer Fredette did bench press 185 lbs 14 times, that is exactly how much Enes Kanter bench pressed, and 11 more times than Kawhi Leonard.

That's pretty pathetic on Kanter's part and really not that impressive for Jimmer either. Soft euro FTMFL.

Ok so while you didn't post the numbers you did negatively comment on them. I guess I just remembered wrong.

Weak does not mean awkward, non-authoritative post game. If you wanted to say that, you would have. Weak means weak, or not strong. Awkward means awkward. You also have called Kanter a "skinny euro twerp". If 260 pounds is skinny, then you must be one large dude.

It seems to me that you probably have more of a problem with European players than anything else, so continue to let your bias work against you. Cheers.

 

[JohnStockalypse]

Weak can also mean poor, bad, ******, whack, lame, etc.

I'm convinced you're trolling.

 

[Hantlers]

Weak can also mean poor, bad, ******, whack, lame, etc.

I'm convinced you're trolling.

Ahem. Here's the definition from dictionary.com


1.
not strong; liable to yield, break, or collapse under pressure or strain; fragile; frail: a weak fortress; a weak spot in armor.
2.
lacking in bodily strength or healthy vigor, as from age or sickness; feeble; infirm: a weak old man; weak eyes.
3.
not having much political strength, governing power, or authority: a weak nation; a weak ruler.

If I was to say, "Yo man, that **** is weak", that would mean that you're not coming at me strong. Strong is an antonym for weak. English lesson of the day for you.

Edited to say that I'm not trolling, I'm just bored.

 

[JohnStockalypse]

Weak and strong don't always refer to physical strength, troll-face. Arguments can be weak, like yours. Things can have a strong odor, like your mother.

I'm done with you, troll. Be gone.

 

[Hantlers]

Once your opponent has gone to insulting you, that's when you know that they have run out of things to say. Congratulations on insulting my mother and proving yourself wrong even further.

 

[JohnStockalypse]

Once your opponent has gone to insulting you, that's when you know that they have run out of things to say. Congratulations on insulting my mother and proving yourself wrong even further.

Funny from the guy who started slinging the insults first. Plus...I never said she had a bad odor...just a strong one. Guilty conscience?

You're a laugh-a-minute!

 

[Dr. Jones]

So, back to topic. No.

 

[Hantlers]

So, back to topic. No.

Topics are overrated.

 

[BENTLEY]

Yeah, having gone over this stuff a bit the past few days I was infected with the hype and got caught up in the idealized hope for what JV could become. But sanity prevails. The draft is a gamble, sure. But you wanna take a wise, measured gamble and bet on things that are more concrete rather than stuff that is largely based on future potential. JV's potential is nice but Kanter's more of a sure thing.

I think someone - maybe Beantown - put it most succinctly when he said something like "rather than hope JV becomes like Kanter why don't we just draft Kanter?" I've remembered it wrong but you get the gist.

 

[BENTLEY]

My last post might seem like my final word on the matter. It isn't. If KOC ended up drafting JV instead of Kanter I would feel pretty secure that JV would pan out eventually. Not right away. But I'm not too concerned with how good the Jazz will be next year anyway.

 

[colton]

In all seriousness, can someone please explain to me what the difference is between JV and Shawn Bradley? I haven't watched the tape myself, but from the pluses and minuses that people have mentioned in this thread that's seriously what he is seeming like to me.

 

[Hantlers]

My last post might seem like my final word on the matter. It isn't. If KOC ended up drafting JV instead of Kanter I would feel pretty secure that JV would pan out eventually. Not right away. But I'm not too concerned with how good the Jazz will be next year anyway.

Oh we're aware. You've been flip-flopping on everybody for months.