10x better than Simmons statistically.10/1/3, 25% fg, +/- -31
That is a historically bad performance
10x better than Simmons statistically.
Nah, Mitchell doesn't have the benefit of multiple great scorers to defer to like Ben. He is the #1 option. Little Ben can let the real scorers do their job and disapear. Mitchell has to keep trying to score regardless of how much the defense focuses on him. Simmons wouldn't understand that.at least Ben took only 4 shots and did not hurt the team with poor shooting. Your superstar took 16 shots and made only 4. DM is the biggest culprit for this loss.
And just like Ben, he's a rookie who's had a brilliant year. He tried to do too much this game and the stage appeared too big from him. No doubt in my mind he'll learn from it and use it as a motivator.at least Ben took only 4 shots and did not hurt the team with poor shooting. Your superstar took 16 shots and made only 4. DM is the biggest culprit for this loss.
10x better than Simmons statistically.
Nope 10 is better than 1. What grade are you in again? I thought you had math. Maybe they don't teach that in Australia.mitchell 10/1/3
Ben 1/7/5/1
stats wise Ben's performance was probably slightly better. hahaha
Nope 10 is better than 1. What grade are you in again? I thought you had math. Maybe they don't teach that in Australia.
And turnovers, Simmons secret weapon.Ben had more rebounds, assists and steal, and a higher +/-
And turnovers, Simmons secret weapon.
And turnovers, Simmons secret weapon.
Mitchell was not bad too, had 3 turnovers in the game
and a 25% FG.