What's new
By:

Following Potential 2018 Draftees

I get what you are saying HH. I do.

I personally think that Brooklyn might see more in Burks and Harris (who they can more comfortably keep with $4 more of space) than Carroll and #29. This is all contingent on Brooklyn getting to #29 and not loving their options. That's what happens when teams sell their picks low. They simply don't love a prospect.

More than likely, Brooklyn takes somebody at #29, but I think this trade idea might interest them depending on who is on the board.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Okay, I def want Huerter.

I watched his frosh highlights. Unimpressive. A bunch of threes. Some dunks that were unathletic looking. Looked very white.

Then I watched his soph highlights. There’s a night and day difference in the athleticism, twitchiness. The difference jumped off the screen to me. His handle. Everything looked better.

With our staff and P3, if the kid is a worker, he could maybe continue to untap some of this athleticism and develop his overall game.
 
Last edited:
I don't get how the concept is so foreign. We are fans. We discuss ideas and we react to what happens. If you dont think that DL and his staff are presenting 100s of ideas daily about every pick position, you just don't get it.

5 of our best 6 players (DM, Faves, Rubio, Gobert, and Crowder) were acquired via a trade. 5 OF 6. Sure we could "trust the draft" and "development" but trades are a major part of our DNA.

Ideas have to come from somewhere and they evolve.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Wes Mantooth said:
Okay, I def want Huerter.

I watched his frosh highlights. Unimpressive. A bunch of threes. Some dunks that were in athletic looking. Looked very white.

Then I watched his soph highlights. There’s a night and day difference in the athleticism, twitchiness. The difference jumped off the screen to me. His handle. Everything looked better.

With our staff and P3, if the kid is a worker, he could maybe continue to untap some of this athleticism and develop his overall game.
Click to expand...

told you...this kid is exactly what we need.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
I do love that we are all making it out like DL targets and gets his guy and has convictions without doubt... he laid the groundwork on the Denver deal but they called him, he admitted they didn’t know he was this good... I mean no one could have predicted that. Rudy was in part because Sloan loved him at his workout...he’s been excellent but don’t ignore the luck element.

He also locked into trey Lyles because of the balance beam test... he’s great but he’s been fortunate too.

Let’s say they do all their questioning on KBD and Frazier and think it’s teally a coin flip... does that mean he’s not decisive or lacks conviction? Or does it just mean projecting this stuff is hard and you do your best and hope to hit more than you miss? I’d just like to get s couple swings because I think there are worthy prospects out to 35/40ish
Click to expand...
There are no coin flips.

There is no way they are drafting Rudy just cause Sloan liked him. They just assign each draft pick these little stories for the public to consume. DL has done it for every pick he has made.
 
LoPo said:
I don't get how the concept is so foreign. We are fans. We discuss ideas and we react to what happens. If you dont think that DL and his staff are presenting 100s of ideas daily about every pick position, you just don't get it.

5 of our best 6 players (DM, Faves, Rubio, Gobert, and Crowder) were acquired via a trade. 5 OF 6. Sure we could "trust the draft" and "development" but trades are a major part of our DNA.

Ideas have to come from somewhere and they evolve.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

Ideas are good.

You have a history of incessantly posting primarily terrible trade ideas with some good stuff mixed in. Then when people call you out, you go to the routine “oh well I guess you know everything so we should just talk about nothing!” bit that you like to pull out. Your routine gets stale. It isn’t so much that people don’t like trade ideas, it’s just you. It feels like it’s all you post about, and you can’t handle people disagreeing with you.
 
LoPo said:
If we are trying to get another pick because we really like guys like Okobo, Okobie, Diop, etc, would people (other than Cy of course) think this is conceivable:

Burks, cash, #52 and a future 2nd
for
Carroll and #29
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ybwtjr94

Why for Brooklyn - #1 - Burks makes $4 million less than Carroll next season. So we give them cash and save them cash in this deal. The Nets are rebuilding and Burks is 6 years younger. Maybe they think he can turn into a success story like Joe Harris.

Why for us: Carroll immediately becomes part of our rotation. If Favors leaves, he's probably the starter. #29 can be used on one of those guys I listed before.


Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
So Burks gets a first round pick and a better player? Are you high? The Jazz cant even offload Burks for free.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top