What's new

Donald Fires FBI Director who's investigating Russian Election Hacking

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
The Vienna summit was in '61. Fishiepoo, do you recall the Vienna Summit, and how you felt about it?

I wasn't there, but it was in the news. K pounding on the table with his shoe saying "Wel'll bury you!!!" and something to the effect that communism would take American from the inside.

Not much laughter, folks.

Trump, with his MAGA campaign and general braggadocio manner, in a cult of UN true believers, saying anything.... would imo get the goons mocking. Maybe more now than before just because the goons are encouraged with the hope for a blue wave taking the wind outta Trumps sails.

Mark Levin says if the Ds take back the House, there'll be two more years of "Addicted to Outrage" like the past two, only then there'll be a megaphone in the D's hands and committees investigating everything imaginable, except Hillary's server and Obama's community organizing genius. And, oh..... yah..... more million dollar speaking gigs for Bill and Hillary in Russian universities.
 
Well, I expect Kavanaugh will be seated in the Supreme Court next week, but I don't think that will wake up the screamin' ninnies to the fact that Americans are increasingly rejecting the whole "Addicted to Outrage" movement. It would take some very savvy "community organizer" to get the crazies to just shut up for five weeks and quietly roll out the vote machines.
 
In a historic unprecedented witch hunt, Mueller had a license to investigate everything in the universe, he thought. He can't just say "Duh.... I got nuthin'". Besides he has a record to live up to.... But damn certain some D "community organizer" or another has told him to sit down and shut up until the midterm election is over. If the Ds win, he'll be back... still with nuthin….. but eager to trump up some impeachment charges for Pelosi. If he keeps chirping, he'll cost the Ds a lot of votes..... maybe stir up a red outrage.

Manafort agreed to cooperate by telling the truth.... something he was legally obligated to in testifying to anything under any witness oath. Mueller did not specify any new area of interest for his investigation, and there is nothing in anything Manafort has said, yet, that concedes any fact beyond his own fairly undeniable or already-proven law violations in taxes and finance, and his sentence is probably a little overboard. Trump might not want to get involved in "pardoning" tax cheats, really.

nah, all Mueller got was a way to close up shop smiling, and get his plane ticket for Peru.... or whatever country that doesn't smile on extradition requests from the US. Just in case the R's hang on or gain steam enough to not only shut down his little D/Press/DeepState kissing booth, but implicate him with Orr.

But @babe, you did not answer a single one of the questions I asked. What did Manafort offer in his required sit down with Mueller's team that caused Mueller to offer generous terms to a man he had by the balls, and therefore Mueller could not possibly lose in a second trial? A prosecutor does not offer such deals out of the goodness of his heart or because he is thinking "poor Manafort, he has suffered enough". At any rate, I posed a series of reasonable questions based on what we know regarding the plea deal. You answered not a single one.
 
Last edited:
Well, I expect Kavanaugh will be seated in the Supreme Court next week, but I don't think that will wake up the screamin' ninnies to the fact that Americans are increasingly rejecting the whole "Addicted to Outrage" movement. It would take some very savvy "community organizer" to get the crazies to just shut up for five weeks and quietly roll out the vote machines.

Are you actually lumping rape victims in with social justice warriors?

Dude, you're slippin...
 
Are you actually lumping rape victims in with social justice warriors?

Dude, you're slippin...
Are you talking to babe? If so, that dude lost his mind long ago.
 
Back
Top