What's new

Keillor and MeToo

If what you were saying was true you would be looking into the truth not just forming opinions in spite of facts. You really should spend more time researching.

If you have Injustice you should be believing women who are telling what ****** men are doing to them.

If you want to not be lumped in and feel attacked as a men you would step up, believe women, and fight to stop ****** men from doing ****** things.
Why should I believe women who don't have sufficient evidence. You're not getting the point; you're just swept up in the MeToo hysteria. Listen, that's it for me. I don't want to spend any more time defending my opinion. And that's what you should be attacking, not me, if you look back at the responses. Most have been personal attacks rather than providing arguments, or links to articles without pointing out the main points that support their opinion. I'm sorry I disagree but that doesn't make me evil; I didn't do anything immoral and I have never sexually harassed a woman.
 
I never harassed anyone of this board. I've told my story in great detail and demonstrated that. And the other person has lied about our interaction. I'm not going to talk about this again. Why do you attack me for expressing my opinion. That is mean-spirited and unworthy of this board and its rules. Instead of attacking me, why don't you provide a better argument related to the topic.
Incorrect, you have harassed many with your "story" and trying to get to the bottom of being teased. You tried to harass someone at work...

This makes me think that based on your ignorance of this issue you very ignorant on sexual assault issue and are probably unaware of whether or not you have sexually harassed a women.
 
I didn't do anything immoral
giphy.gif
 
Why should I believe women who don't have sufficient evidence. You're not getting the point; you're just swept up in the MeToo hysteria. Listen, that's it for me. I don't want to spend any more time defending my opinion. And that's what you should be attacking, not me, if you look back at the responses. Most have been personal attacks rather than providing arguments, or links to articles without pointing out the main points that support their opinion. I'm sorry I disagree but that doesn't make me evil; I didn't do anything immoral and I have never sexually harassed a woman.

They have plenty of evidence. They are an eye witness, that is evidence and good evidence. They also have history on their side.
 
Banned for what? I haven't done anything that breaks the rules, but a lot of people in this thread have attacked me in ways that people in the past have gotten suspended for.
If you see no issue with these posts:

So tell me where those 1 in 4 stats come from and how do you know they are reliable. You have a source? I would say that maybe there are 1 in 4 women who are attractive enough to excite desire in men but not all men are going to harass them. Unless maybe you are a mentally-ill person like Cosby or Jerry Sandusky, and the latter didn't like women.

You're smart enough to understand, I think, if you are a man. If you're one of the other 3/4 of the opposite sex who are not so physically attractive, you are probably insulted but I'm only speaking my opinion. Sexiness and beauty is in the eye of the beholder; none of us are attracted to nearly every other person of the opposite sex ...

Then there is probably no help for you. You have no interest in learning more, or getting better. You just thought the time was ripe for some anti #metoo BS. Congrats, you did it.

Everyone in here who thought you might want to become more informed, and a better person with more perspective on the issue has completely wasted their time.
 
You're smart enough to understand, I think, if you are a man. If you're one of the other 3/4 of the opposite sex who are not so physically attractive, you are probably insulted but I'm only speaking my opinion. Sexiness and beauty is in the eye of the beholder; none of us are attracted to nearly every other person of the opposite sex ...

Harrassment has nearly nothing to do with attractiveness, sexual or otherwise.
 
Harrassment has nearly nothing to do with attractiveness, sexual or otherwise.
It certainly factors in many cases. I'll bet attractive women are far more likely to get extra attention from men, which some women who don't want it, now consider harassment. I just call it biology, so long as a man keeps boundaries. But now some women say that if a man gives a woman a look with desire, they consider it harassment. Who knows, maybe the guy was licking his lips after eating some pizza.
 
Back
Top