Keillor and MeToo

[Zombie]

I just finished reading the Jazz bear thread and saw a lot more things that I didn't see in here or make sense.

After reading both threads now, yeah, EM wrote some pretty questionable things to say the least.

I read this thread first and when I made it to the comment of someone calling EM a sexual harasser at work and to ban him, I was like, damn man, pump the breaks.

It makes more sense to me now having read everything.

Let the frenzy continue. I apologize for trying to stick up for a guy I normally make fun of a lot.

Lol, it's good man. I usually am just amused by Eenie's... eccentricity but he crossed a bunch of lines here.

 

[Archie Moses]

I mean, he literally tried to argue that most women aren't attractive enough to molest. He deserves all the **** he is catching on here and more.

Yeah, I didn't see that at the time. I skimmed through the thread pretty fast.

 

[Archie Moses]

Lol, it's good man. I usually am just amused by Eenie's... eccentricity but he crossed a bunch of lines here.

Trust me, I would never have written what I did if I read the Jazz bear fired thread. With only read the first 2 or 3 pages of this thread, it seemed like people were being super harsh. They were because of what he wrote in the other thread - rightfully so.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

I dont even dare read this thread lmao. I know Eenie is going full retard.

 

[Gameface]

I always hate to bring this up, but it's just a fact... EM has legit mental problems. His jazzfanz history is completely ****ing whacky.

Archie, do you know he's the person who tracked down One Brow in real life, called him and confronted him about his belief that OB was also Ain't Nuthin?

 

[Archie Moses]

I always hate to bring this up, but it's just a fact... EM has legit mental problems. His jazzfanz history is completely ****ing whacky.

Archie, do you know he's the person who tracked down One Brow in real life, called him and confronted him about his belief that OB was also Ain't Nuthin?

Yeah, dude. Haha.

See the bold prediction thread.

I have 4.

Eenie- Meenie calls only 2 forum members at work.

Jazzfanz brings back the rep system.

I single handedly neg EM into red.

He calls me at work.

Again, I didn't see any of his comments/jokes in the other thread and when I read this I was like, damn, people are going straight harsh on him. I understand why now.

 

[Ron Mexico]

Thanks for accusing me of something I never did and about which you know nothing about. And I didn't harass anyone at work; I was responding to continual harassment that I received on this board like 12 years ago and merely asked the person to stop. Yeah, and if I was getting "teased" as you say, then that is harassment, bullying if you want to put it more clearly. I was only defending myself not harassing people -- it was the other way around.

Calling someone at their work to accuse them of using an alt account on a message board to "bully" you is harassment.

I'm also not accusing you have sexual harassment. I just said you wouldn't know if you had due to the ignorance on this issue.

 

[Ron Mexico]

Who are the eyewitnesses to She said/He said? An eyewitness has to be a third-party in these cases. For instance, none of the alleged eyewitnesses Ford identified supported her story. This is exactly what I mean by accusing without evidence.

So you feel the same way and are up in arms when people are accused of theft and the only proof is a store employee being the eye witness?

 

[Getting Traded]

So you feel the same way and are up in arms when people are accused of theft and the only proof is a store employee being the eye witness?

It's not a comparable comparison, and I'm not ignorant on this issue. I just see it differently. And about the 12 year ago thing. Why don't you let it go. I've been trying to, but people on this board won't. In any case, you aren't a reliable person to comment on it because you weren't even on the board then. I know what happened and One Brow is not telling the truth, ok. How many times do I have to repeat it. So, please, stop it. I changed my username because of that incident when people got on my case because I revealed it, not someone else. And it all started because I was trying to get people to stop attacking people on the site and stick to talking about basketball.

 

[Archie Moses]

What was your old username, EM? Rom Mexico has been on the board that long, but changed his name too.

 

[gandalfe]

It's not a comparable comparison, and I'm not ignorant on this issue. I just see it differently.

Your very comments in this thread have shown you to have a level of obliviousness that is frankly somewhat shocking. Please stop proving what a shining example of the Dunning-Kruger effect you are.

 

[Getting Traded]

Falsehood -- An eyewitness does not need to be a third party. If I'm a store owner and I say someone took a candy bar and I saw it that's typically all the evidence needed for a conviction.

Try again!

That's a third party. Ford's accusations don't have an eyewitness or a third party. All they can say is that Kavanaugh was a drunken teenager. The point I'm making is that as soon as someone is accused, they're considered guilty, the same way in the 50s when people were accused of being communists. And people use statistics to back up the accusations instead of facts pointing to the particular case. That's what a lot of the articles in the press have done and most are written by women. The thing that bothered me about the Keillor thing was that only one person was identified so you really don't know if there were others and we don't know what the alleged others said because it wasn't spelled out. I certainly believe the accusations against people like Charlie Rose but Keillor is a much different persona. He may have crossed the line with that one woman but I think it was out of character for him to do that. It's hard to say because we don't know all the facts. Maybe I'm wrong but that's my gut feeling of the situation.