What's new
By:

2019 Trade Deadline Discussion

Kyoto said:
It would get rid of that contract of Dante's. KCP is in his only year of his contract
Click to expand...

Yeah, but the Jazz don't need to get rid of Exum's contract. He'll either pan out at some level or he won't, but he's about the only young player we have with unrealized upside. He's the gamble you keep taking for one more year. He may never be a starting-caliber PG, but he might be a guy you can put next to one.
 
LoPo said:
Re-signing Favors was smart if he is used in a trade prior to the deadline. I think his contract goes down as a massive failure if he stays through the season. We could have had Bjelica for 1/3 and Randle for 1/2 of his deal.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

Bjelica doesn't defend well enough to be considered more than a one-dimensional scorer off the bench. For whatever reason, the Jazz didn't want Randle. If they did, they would have offered Favors' deal to Randle.
 
The Jazz have such solid defense, we're just aching to add a guy who is a tough defender, but who can also pull up and drill a 3 off the dribble. Rubio, Crowder, Royce, Thabo--they're good defenders and rotational players, but they need to be spoon fed on offense.

A tough, 6'4" two-way guard like a Chauncey Billups could be amazing on this team.
 
Kyoto said:
We shouldnt have re-signed him in the first place. PHX needs a PG, and the Jazz would have more financial wiggle room by dumping the exum contract. I think this would be a win-win-win
Click to expand...

The financial wiggle room we get from trading Burks for Kover, signing Favors on a team option, having Thabo and Udoh expire and having Rubio expire is more than sufficient. We can clear max space if we can find someone worth giving it to.
 
Catchall said:
The financial wiggle room we get from trading Burks for Kover, signing Favors on a team option, having Thabo and Udoh expire and having Rubio expire is more than sufficient. We can clear max space if we can find someone worth giving it to.
Click to expand...

You would rather have exum than rubio?
 
Kyoto said:
You would rather have exum than rubio?
Click to expand...

It's not an either/or decision. Exum is probably not going to be the starting PG, but he's not costing the Jazz Rubio if the Jazz want to re-sign him. We can go over the cap to re-sign Rubio if that's what numbers dictate.
 
If the Jazz don't plan to re-sign Rubio, in my opinion they should try to trade him the season.

This story to re-sign good character players that likes to be part of the Jazz has to finish.
Rubio won't make the Jazz a contender.

I worry that Quin will push to re-sign Rubio.
 
Last edited:
Catchall said:
The Jazz have such solid defense, we're just aching to add a guy who is a tough defender, but who can also pull up and drill a 3 off the dribble. Rubio, Crowder, Royce, Thabo--they're good defenders and rotational players, but they need to be spoon fed on offense.
Click to expand...
This is why I'm okay adding somebody like Randle who might not be a great defender but his offense is something we need.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Catchall said:
It's not an either/or decision. Exum is probably not going to be the starting PG, but he's not costing the Jazz Rubio if the Jazz want to re-sign him. We can go over the cap to re-sign Rubio if that's what numbers dictate.
Click to expand...

Why not get rid of both? I am a Rubio homer, but if people are unhappy with both why not get rid of both?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top