What's new
By:

Utah Jazz 2018-19 Championship Bus CHOO CHOO

Piso said:
Shooting stats for Rubio :
Last season :
october : 2P 24/49 49% ; 3P 13/37 35% ; FT 23/26 88% ; TS=56.7% good
november : 2P 38/85 44% ; 3P 14/51 27% ; FT 46/51 90% ; TS=51.9% bad
december : 2P 41/98 42% ; 3P 10/41 24% ; FT 24/29 83% ; TS=44.7% super trash
january : 2P 42/90 47% ; 3P 15/42 36% ; FT 25/30 83% ; TS=53.1% mediocre
february : 2P 32/68 47% ; 3P 11/22 50% ; FT 31/36 86% ; TS=60.4% very good
march : 2P 50/121 41% ; 3P 22/56 39% ; FT 54/65 83% ; TS=53.0% mediocre
april : 2P 23/39 59% ; 3P 13/24 54% ; FT 17/17 100% ; TS=71.6% excellent
total season : 2P 250/554 45% ; 3P 96/273 35% ; FT 220/254 87% ; TS=53.7% mediocre

70% Rubio's shots are open. 81% Rubio's shots are in shot clock range 24s-7s

This season :
october : 2P 11/36 31% ; 3P 8/25 32% ; FT 17/19 89% ; TS=45.4% super trash
november : 2P 50/112 45% ; 3P 24/76 32% ; FT 47/59 80% ; TS=51.2% bad
december : 2P 47/106 44% ; 3P 19/50 38% ; FT 23/25 92% ; TS=52.1% mediocre
january : 2P 34/64 53% ; 3P 11/38 29% ; FT 20/23 87% ; TS=54.0% average
february : 2P 21/40 52% ; 3P 8/23 35% ; FT 21/25 84% ; TS=58.8% good
total season : 2P 163/358 46% ; 3P 70/212 33% ; FT 128/151 85% ; TS=52.2% mediocre

68% Rubio's shots are open. 83% Rubio's shots are in shot clock range 24s-7s

Shooting stats for Mitchell :
Last season :
october : 2P 17/48 35% ; 3P 8/28 29% ; FT 7/8 88% ; TS=40.9% super trash
november : 2P 60/136 44% ; 3P 39/104 38% ; FT 34/42 81% ; TS=52.4% mediocre
december : 2P 84/142 59% ; 3P 29/81 36% ; FT 45/51 88% ; TS=61.1% very good
january : 2P 75/138 54% ; 3P 32/100 32% ; FT 42/53 79% ; TS=55,1% average
february : 2P 49/113 43% ; 3P 29/76 38% ; FT 29/34 85% ; TS=52,5% mediocre
march : 2P 87/165 53% ; 3P 37/127 29% ; FT 60/79 76% ; TS=52,8% mediocre
april : 2P 36/70 51% ; 3P 13/34 38% ; FT 22/30 73% ; TS=56,7% good
total season : 2P 408/812 50% ; 3P 187/550 34% ; FT 239/297 80% ; TS=54,1% average

54% Mitchell's shots are open. 80% Mitchell's shots are in shot clock range 24s-7s

This season :
october : 2P 44/89 49% ; 3P 18/50 36% ; FT 21/27 78% ; TS=54.0% average
november : 2P 73/140 52% ; 3P 19/78 24% ; FT 43/53 81% ; TS=51.0% bad
december : 2P 66/153 43% ; 3P 28/94 30% ; FT 39/51 76% ; TS=47,3% trash
january : 2P 104/220 47% ; 3P 42/102 41% ; FT 81/102 79% ; TS=56,6% good
february : 2P 43/105 41% ; 3P 12/44 27% ; FT 26/30 87% ; TS=45,6% super trash
total season : 2P 330/707 47% ; 3P 119/368 32% ; FT 210/263 80% ; TS=51,5% bad

44% Mitchell's shots are open. 81% Mitchell's shots are in shot clock range 24s-7s
Click to expand...

I don't understand. Are there any categories between very good and excellent? The gap seems too wide. 71% is just excellent? I think 62%-64.9% should be excellent. 65%-68.9% is epic. 69%+ super epic. That way we even have symmetry in the categories.

Please consider this.
 
Spinoza said:
As of today, even with Blazers win over the 76ers, 538 has Jazz, Rockets, and Blazers all tied for 4th with a 49-33 record. This unfortunately puts the Blazers 4th and the Jazz 5th because Portland went 4-3 this season against Jazz/Rockets, we went 4-4 against Blazers/Rockets and Rockets went 3-4 against Jazz/Blazers.
Click to expand...
Makes sense. That's about what I figure.
I think the seeding is going to come down the last game for these 3 teams. I predict we finish 4th and I hope we get the blazers rather than the rockets in round 1.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Gotta go 2-1 next week somehow. Its by far the hardest remaining week of our schedule, and we could go on a serious winning streak after that.
 
fishonjazz said:
Makes sense. That's about what I figure.
I think the seeding is going to come down the last game for these 3 teams. I predict we finish 4th and I hope we get the blazers rather than the rockets in round 1.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
Same but I honestly hate both of those matchups for the Jazz unless Lillard and CJ stink it up in the playoffs again.
 
NAOS said:
It's too early to say if we're worse than last year's team.
Click to expand...

Nope. I'm sorry, it's not. We have regressed.

Defensive Rating
17/18: 103.9 (2nd in the NBA, Went on a large run where we had a Drtg under 100)
18/19: 105.8 (4th in the NBA)

Difference: down 1.9, two spots in the rankings

Opponent PPG
17/18: 99.8 (2nd in the NBA)
18/19: 105.9 (4th in the NBA)

Difference: down 6.1, two spots in the rankings

Offensive Rating
17/18: 108.4 (16th)
18/19: 109.0 (20th)

Difference: up 0.6 which is minimal given teams are up in this category league wide due to rules making offense easier, down 4 spots in the rankings (and down as a whole when factoring the new rules/style of play)

PPG
17/18: 104.1 (19th)
18/19: 109.2 (20th)

Difference: up 5.1, down one spot in the rankings. Same situation as offensive rating.

Point Differential
17/18: +4.3
18/19: +3.3

Difference: down 1.0

FG%
17/18: 46.2% (13th)
18/19: 46.1% (16th)

Difference: down 0.1% when it's easier to score league wide

2FG%
17/18: 51.5% (12th)
18/19: 53.6% (9th)

Difference: up 2.1%, one bright spot

3FG%
17/18: 36.6% (12th)
18/19: 34.6% (24th)

Difference: down 2.0%, Big drop

FT%
17/18: 77.9% (12th)
18/19: 73.3% (26th)

Difference: down 4.6%, Big drop

Rebounds
17/18: 43.3 (20th)
18/19: 45.3 (19th)

Difference: Up 2.0, one spot

Assists
17/18: 22.4 (21st)
18/19: 25.0 (17th)

Difference: up 2.6, four spots.

Steals
17/18: 8.6 (4th)
18/19: 8.3 (12th)

Difference: down 0.3, eight spots

Blocks
17/18: 5.1 (9th)
18/19: 5.5 (10th)

Difference: up 0.4, down one spot

Opponent FG%
17/18: 44.9% (6th)
18/19: 45.6% (12th)

Difference: down 0.7%, six spots

Opponent 3FG%
17/18: 36.5% (17th)
18/19: 35.9% (20th)

Difference: up 0.6%, down three spots

Opponent 2FG%
17/18: 48.8% (4th)
18/19: 50.2% (6th)

Difference: down 1.4%, two spots

Opponent Rebounds
17/18: 41.6 (1st)
18/19: 42.6 (2nd)

Difference: down 1.0, one spot

Opponent Assists
17/18: 20.0 (1st)
18/19: 21.2 (1st)

Difference: down 1.2



We are worse on both sides of the ball. Not only that, Rubio's numbers are down. Ingles numbers are down. Mitchell's efficiency is down. We are not as good as last season. Plain and simple.
 
SCS said:
We are worse on both sides of the ball. Not only that, Rubio's numbers are down. Ingles numbers are down. Mitchell's efficiency is down. We are not as good as last season. Plain and simple.
Click to expand...

You haven't taken schedule into account. The Jazz have had something like the 2nd hardest schedule so far, and have the 2nd easiest schedule remaining. So what you should do is remove a bunch of easy games from last year's schedule and recompare.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top