What's new

Jussie Smollet

... buying a new tv and taking a vacation. What are you left with? A third world country where there are no jobs, no structure, no hope, no future.

You don't think buying TVs nor taking vacations creates jobs? Why do you hate capitalism?
 
You don't think buying TVs nor taking vacations creates jobs? Why do you hate capitalism?

Im saying you dont have over the goods and services from the people people who created it and earned it to people who didnt create it and didnt earn it. You don't bankrupt the smart to successful prop up the bad decision makers.

I know this is foreign logic to you, but there is such thing as making a bad investment. You can actually waste money.

Democrat logic - pay the car payment before you pay the house payment.
 
Im saying you dont have over the goods and services from the people people who created it and earned it to people who didnt create it and didnt earn it.

Except, that's not what you said.

If you want to stimulate an economy, you give money to people who will spend it, not save it.
 
I've read more about this situation and it's pretty interesting to the point of being fascinating. From what I understand, there's obvious more to the story we're not hearing. Basically, the reason why the charges were dropped because it was so publically known how guilty he was with all the evidence and media coverage that the prosecution thought they couldn't win because of not being able to give him a fair trial. Being too guilty to convict is next level **** imo. Also, I bet the brothers may have changed their story or something with them.

Either way, this is one of the weirdest things to read about since Anthony Weiner weiner / dong pics.

The producers and writers immediately having Smollett's back is interesting too. I mean, they could actually feel he's innocent and has been vindicated, but how many of us would publicly express support for a person like Smollett if they were your coworker? Money sure can help.

Another reason to believe we've been living in an alternate reality since Trump's election.
Too guilty to be guilty lol. What a world

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
The prosecution said they believe he is guilty, it is not uncommon for cases to be sent to alternative prosecution, he agreed to forfeit his $10,000 bail and community service. That seems like enough punishment for pretending to get beat up to me. If it were any average Joe we might say it is excessive.

One thing that boggles my mind is our judicial system and the amount of time people serve due to their crimes/charges and how many people support that ****. "Throw the book at them!"

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for justice, but putting people behind bars for years and years doesn't benefit society. I should say, I'm talking about non-violent, and victimless crimes (for the most part.)

Smollett being charged with in the teens amount of felonies was a bit too much for me.
 
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for justice, but putting people behind bars for years and years doesn't benefit society. I should say, I'm talking about non-violent, and victimless crimes (for the most part.)

Smollett being charged with in the teens amount of felonies was a bit too much for me.

I also felt that the 16 count indictment was a bit much.

Kind of funny (in a sad way) - the very conservative friend I walked with this morning, when I commented that I understood (to a point) the prosecutor's comment that JS was a first time offender and this was not a violent crime - replied "It sure was a violent crime, by his claiming the MAGA connection, it was a violent crime against anyone who voted for Trump."
She also blamed much of "it" on the fact that we've taken God out of public education. I really lit into her for that statement.
 
Except, that's not what you said.

If you want to stimulate an economy, you give money to people who will spend it, not save it.

No you dont.

Spending money isnt the answer. Investing money is.

Do you know how much it takes to start a business, develop an idea, etc..?

Somebody has to make the product. Its doesnt appear out of thin air because you have paper.

As much as you lefties hate rich people the truth is we wouldnt be nearly as developed as a society and world, if someone wasnt amassing large amounts of wealth to apply to a big idea.

Im sorry, a whole bunch of lazy people with equal amounts of paper arent going to magically start and run successfully, a TV making plant. Not without some hierarchy.

Me and you cant even agree on simple things. How in the world are you going to get 1000's of people just to magically work together and get things done. Its a fantasy bro.

All you do when you give money away to the poor is cause inflation. You dont necessarily increase the amount of goods and services in the system at a positive value to the people creating things. People need to create something, then trade it for something else created.
 
Except, that's not what you said.

If you want to stimulate an economy, you give money to people who will spend it, not save it.

The leftist idea to just have government tax is no different than the idea of a company taxing your contributions and labor.

Except the difference is the government doesn't provide a variety of ideas and are most likely to screw it up because of the lack of different ideas.

The incentive to win is important in the development of great ideas.
 
I don't. The USSC has a particular focus. I think you are cherry picking, and likely trolling a little as well.

??? I gave an example of something I hear ad nauseum that isn't true. Odd to consider that cherrypicking somehow. If you feel there is more to it than what I hear being reported then feel free to ad something substantive. I thought about the difference between the Fed and state prosecutions before you brought it up but dont know how I'd go about looking into it. You can point me in the right direction since you are insinuating large discrepencies exist in state prosecutions?
 
One thing that boggles my mind is our judicial system and the amount of time people serve due to their crimes/charges and how many people support that ****. "Throw the book at them!"

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for justice, but putting people behind bars for years and years doesn't benefit society. I should say, I'm talking about non-violent, and victimless crimes (for the most part.)

Smollett being charged with in the teens amount of felonies was a bit too much for me.

I think people would be surprised at how lenient our system is on non-violent, non-drug offenses. This whole thing got started in 1995 or 1996 when somebody clever coined the term prison industrial complex to sell his books. Now we live under this untrue myth that we are packing prisons full to fill private pockets. It's simply not true, but repeat a lie enough and...
 
Back
Top