What's new
By:

Jussie Smollet

NPC D4617 said:
Ya, tell me Im crazy

The judge order details of the case be kept secret and the all the files have allready been wiped from the system. This is not a conspiracy. This is facts. There is a huge cover up here.

They state this towards the end of the video


This has to do something Kamals Harris's anti-lynching bill. She set him up to this.

Holy ****. What a corrupt system we live in. In your face, nothing you can do about it.
Click to expand...


The prosecuting attorney's statements seem reasonable enough to me.
 
NPC D4617 said:
The judge did do it.

Why seal the records? Its obviously to hide something.
Click to expand...
Yea, I missed that at first. But then saw the video post. I thought it was an administrative action not judicial. Either way wiping the records and dropping the charges seems crazy. Even if the Chicago police were the corrupt party in this, and charges ought to have been dropped, let the investigation record stand for itself.
 
Stoked said:
And the disparity in wealth between dual parent and single parent households is there for all to see. Having two parents and better educational opportunities will open more doors to those jobs
Click to expand...

I'm not arguing against that. It's a common misconception that the breakdown in the African American family unit caused today's poverty but the reverse is true. Jobs are the solution.
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
I'm not arguing against that. It's a common misconception that the breakdown in the African American family unit caused today's poverty but the reverse is true. Jobs are the solution.
Click to expand...

Nah.

Universal basic income and reparations are the answer. Just ask the Democratic party.

Because nobody should have to work. Everything can be free. Just have the rich pay for it. Hell, there is so much money in the world we all could just stop working forever.

Those damn rich people hoarding all those magic dollars.

#leftist logic
 
NPC D4617 said:
Nah.

Universal basic income and reparations are the answer. Just ask the Democratic party.

Because nobody should have to work. Everything can be free. Just have the rich pay for it. Hell, there is so much money in the world we all could just stop working forever.

Those damn rich people hoarding all those magic dollars.

#leftist logic
Click to expand...

If you tax the rich and give to impoverished the money goes through the market and back into the hands of the rich and we have less poverty. And a better economy. And lower crime.

I'm not sure about UBI but a hard look at increasing and expanding the EITC is in order. If Trump did that instead of tax cuts for the rich then the economy would be growing much faster and stock prices would be up way higher. And it 2ould have cost less and the debt increase lower.
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
If you tax the rich and give to impoverished the money goes through the market and back into the hands of the rich and we have less poverty. And a better economy. And lower crime.

I'm not sure about UBI but a hard look at increasing and expanding the EITC is in order. If Trump did that instead of tax cuts for the rich then the economy would be growing much faster and stock prices would be up way higher. And it 2ould have cost less and the debt increase lower.
Click to expand...

Giving free money to the poor and watching them blow it is precisely why you dont give them the money.

The Rich guy who knows how to run a business and make sounds investments is bankrupted and the poor guy makes a bunch of bad investments, like buying a new tv and taking a vacation. What are you left with? A third world country where there are no jobs, no structure, no hope, no future.

But the poor idea less and unmotivated guy lived it up for a year. Sweet bro. Sounds like a great idea.

Its certainly a lot more complicated than that and your argument lacks any sound logic. But still pretty funny just get the low fruit first.
 
I've read more about this situation and it's pretty interesting to the point of being fascinating. From what I understand, there's obvious more to the story we're not hearing. Basically, the reason why the charges were dropped because it was so publically known how guilty he was with all the evidence and media coverage that the prosecution thought they couldn't win because of not being able to give him a fair trial. Being too guilty to convict is next level **** imo. Also, I bet the brothers may have changed their story or something with them.

Either way, this is one of the weirdest things to read about since Anthony Weiner weiner / dong pics.

The producers and writers immediately having Smollett's back is interesting too. I mean, they could actually feel he's innocent and has been vindicated, but how many of us would publicly express support for a person like Smollett if they were your coworker? Money sure can help.

Another reason to believe we've been living in an alternate reality since Trump's election.
 
NPC D4617 said:
Giving free money to the poor and watching them blow it is precisely why you dont give them the money.

The Rich guy who knows how to run a business and make sounds investments is bankrupted and the poor guy makes a bunch of bad investments, like buying a new tv and taking a vacation. What are you left with? A third world country where there are no jobs, no structure, no hope, no future.

But the poor idea less and unmotivated guy lived it up for a year. Sweet bro. Sounds like a great idea.

Its certainly a lot more complicated than that and your argument lacks any sound logic. But still pretty funny just get the low fruit first.
Click to expand...

Come on dawg, at minimum you need to quote Say's Law if you're going to try passing off this barbaric rubbish as some sort of enlightened economic thought. Let me know when you get to Chapter 3: Neo-Classical Synthesis so we can continue.
 
Forfeiting the bond, and performing community service were found to be sufficient punishment. Obviously, the police and mayor disagreed, but I don't think the charges were dropped because the prosecution felt it did not have enough evidence. No heads up given to the police was disrespectful.

 
Archie Moses said:
I've read more about this situation and it's pretty interesting to the point of being fascinating. From what I understand, there's obvious more to the story we're not hearing. Basically, the reason why the charges were dropped because it was so publically known how guilty he was with all the evidence and media coverage that the prosecution thought they couldn't win because of not being able to give him a fair trial. Being too guilty to convict is next level **** imo. Also, I bet the brothers may have changed their story or something with them.

Either way, this is one of the weirdest things to read about since Anthony Weiner weiner / dong pics.

The producers and writers immediately having Smollett's back is interesting too. I mean, they could actually feel he's innocent and has been vindicated, but how many of us would publicly express support for a person like Smollett if they were your coworker? Money sure can help.

Another reason to believe we've been living in an alternate reality since Trump's election.
Click to expand...

The prosecution said they believe he is guilty, it is not uncommon for cases to be sent to alternative prosecution, he agreed to forfeit his $10,000 bail and community service. That seems like enough punishment for pretending to get beat up to me. If it were any average Joe we might say it is excessive.

I don't need any deeper a rabbit hole to reason this out than what the prosecution stated. And hey, I read that on Hollywood reporter or whatever it was called so it must be accurate.
 
Stoked said:
Renewing the focus on the family (2 parent households) and better educational opportunities seems like the most logical answer. But it’s one that will likely take 2-3 generations to really start to affect things.
Click to expand...

You have to keep people out of jail for that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top